These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16317859)

  • 1. "Inefficient, arbitrary, inconsistent": a frank look at how some investigators view IRBs and a few suggestions for improvement.
    Hohmann E; Woodson J
    Prot Hum Subj; 2005; (12):12-4. PubMed ID: 16317859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accreditation and certification for human research protection programs.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Nov; 16(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 11883458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recurrent issues in the review of medical research on human subjects.
    Moore DL
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():1-33. PubMed ID: 16296123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The IRB paradox: could the protectors also encourage deceit?
    Keith-Spiegel P; Koocher GP
    Ethics Behav; 2005; 15(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 16578924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Status of ethical review and challenges in India.
    Muthuswamy V
    Indian Pediatr; 2005 Dec; 42(12):1189-90. PubMed ID: 16424554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Research ethics boards--operational issues I.
    Lynch A
    NCEHR Commun; 1999; 9(2):9-14. PubMed ID: 15540381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees.
    Klitzman R
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human research ethics in practice: deliberative strategies, processes and perceptions.
    Gillam L; Guillemin M; Bolitho A; Rosenthal D
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2009 Mar; 28(1):7.1-17. PubMed ID: 19839277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ethics committees in Australia and New Zealand: a critique.
    McNeill PM
    Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):113-9. PubMed ID: 15282928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The need to understand IRB deliberations.
    Candilis PJ; Lidz CW; Arnold RM
    IRB; 2006; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16680872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maximizing the effectiveness of REBs.
    Fuks A; Beauvais C
    NCEHR Commun; 2000; 10(2):9-15. PubMed ID: 15468467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. IRBs and financial conflict of interest.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 2001 Nov; 16(11):3. PubMed ID: 11883459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the ethical review process in Sudan.
    Elsayed DE; Kass NE
    Dev World Bioeth; 2007 Dec; 7(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 18021119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What do IRBs look like? What kind of support do they receive?
    De Vries RG; Forsberg CP
    Account Res; 2002; 9(3-4):199-216. PubMed ID: 12816128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Professional responsibility and the protection of human subjects of research in Canada.
    Dinsdale H
    Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):80-5. PubMed ID: 16459419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Protecting human subjects in the NIH's Intramural Research Program: a draft instrument to evaluate convened meetings of its IRBs.
    Wichman A; Kalyan DN; Abbott LJ; Wesley R; Sandler AL
    IRB; 2006; 28(3):7-10. PubMed ID: 17036438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Making research ethics review work in Zimbabwe--the case for investment in local capacity.
    Mielke J; Ndebele P
    Cent Afr J Med; 2004; 50(11-12):115-9. PubMed ID: 16615661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Teaching research ethics: illustrating the nature of the researcher-IRB relationship.
    Brinthaupt TM
    Teach Psychol; 2002; 29(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 15295829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A relational ethical dialogue with research ethics committees.
    Larkin PJ; de Casterlé BD; Schotsmans P
    Nurs Ethics; 2008 Mar; 15(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 18272613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethics review needs to grow up.
    Nicholson RH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2002; 32(3):8. PubMed ID: 12085519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.