These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16317859)
1. "Inefficient, arbitrary, inconsistent": a frank look at how some investigators view IRBs and a few suggestions for improvement. Hohmann E; Woodson J Prot Hum Subj; 2005; (12):12-4. PubMed ID: 16317859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Accreditation and certification for human research protection programs. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2001 Nov; 16(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 11883458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Recurrent issues in the review of medical research on human subjects. Moore DL Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1991; 1():1-33. PubMed ID: 16296123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The IRB paradox: could the protectors also encourage deceit? Keith-Spiegel P; Koocher GP Ethics Behav; 2005; 15(4):339-49. PubMed ID: 16578924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Status of ethical review and challenges in India. Muthuswamy V Indian Pediatr; 2005 Dec; 42(12):1189-90. PubMed ID: 16424554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Research ethics boards--operational issues I. Lynch A NCEHR Commun; 1999; 9(2):9-14. PubMed ID: 15540381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Views of the process and content of ethical reviews of HIV vaccine trials among members of US institutional review boards and South African research ethics committees. Klitzman R Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 19046258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Human research ethics in practice: deliberative strategies, processes and perceptions. Gillam L; Guillemin M; Bolitho A; Rosenthal D Monash Bioeth Rev; 2009 Mar; 28(1):7.1-17. PubMed ID: 19839277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethics committees in Australia and New Zealand: a critique. McNeill PM Not Polit; 2002; 18(67):113-9. PubMed ID: 15282928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The need to understand IRB deliberations. Candilis PJ; Lidz CW; Arnold RM IRB; 2006; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 16680872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Maximizing the effectiveness of REBs. Fuks A; Beauvais C NCEHR Commun; 2000; 10(2):9-15. PubMed ID: 15468467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. IRBs and financial conflict of interest. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2001 Nov; 16(11):3. PubMed ID: 11883459 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of the ethical review process in Sudan. Elsayed DE; Kass NE Dev World Bioeth; 2007 Dec; 7(3):143-8. PubMed ID: 18021119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What do IRBs look like? What kind of support do they receive? De Vries RG; Forsberg CP Account Res; 2002; 9(3-4):199-216. PubMed ID: 12816128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Professional responsibility and the protection of human subjects of research in Canada. Dinsdale H Health Law Rev; 2005; 13(2-3):80-5. PubMed ID: 16459419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protecting human subjects in the NIH's Intramural Research Program: a draft instrument to evaluate convened meetings of its IRBs. Wichman A; Kalyan DN; Abbott LJ; Wesley R; Sandler AL IRB; 2006; 28(3):7-10. PubMed ID: 17036438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Making research ethics review work in Zimbabwe--the case for investment in local capacity. Mielke J; Ndebele P Cent Afr J Med; 2004; 50(11-12):115-9. PubMed ID: 16615661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Teaching research ethics: illustrating the nature of the researcher-IRB relationship. Brinthaupt TM Teach Psychol; 2002; 29(3):243-5. PubMed ID: 15295829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]