226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16318611)
1. A clinical evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone for cervical ripening--a review of current evidence in hospital and outpatient settings.
Rath W
J Perinat Med; 2005; 33(6):491-9. PubMed ID: 16318611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
Brouwers JM; Briët JW; Brouwers JR
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jun; 148(26):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15279216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
Veerman HM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Jan; 149(2):105-6; author reply 106. PubMed ID: 15688844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Misoprostol dose selection in a controlled-release vaginal insert for induction of labor in nulliparous women.
Castañeda CS; Izquierdo Puente JC; Leon Ochoa RA; Plasse TF; Powers BL; Rayburn WF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1071-5. PubMed ID: 16157114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [An open evaluation of prolonged-release dinoprostone with a retrieval system (a formulation of 1.1 MM) in unfavorable cervical ripening in the induction of labor for medical and obstetrical indications].
Moreno García JD; Márquez Becerra MA; Reyes Compain Ydel C; Juárez Azpilcueta AA
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1999 Jul; 67():302-7. PubMed ID: 10496051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A
J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
Ayad IA
East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: a meta-analysis.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Delke I; Gaudier FL
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 94(5 Pt 2):878-83. PubMed ID: 10546777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of misoprostol for cervical ripening.
Katz VL; Farmer RM; Dean CA; Carpenter ME
South Med J; 2000 Sep; 93(9):881-4. PubMed ID: 11005347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of patients' satisfaction of cervical ripening using dinoprostone by either intravaginal gel or pessary: an open-label, randomized, prospective study.
Ferraiolo A; Dellacasa I; Bentivoglio G; Ferrero S; Ragni N
J Reprod Med; 2010; 55(9-10):423-9. PubMed ID: 21043369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone Propess for labor induction].
Mazouni C; Provensal M; Ménard JP; Heckenroth H; Guidicelli B; Gamerre M; Bretelle F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Jun; 34(6):489-92. PubMed ID: 16713322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix].
Grignaffini A; Soncini E; Anfuso S; Ronzoni E
Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Oct; 56(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 15531859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized controlled trial.
Wing DA;
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 18827122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
