These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16318876)
1. Success rate of newborn and follow-up screening of hearing using otoacoustic emissions. Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Gkoritsa E; Eliopoulos P; Rallis E; Ferekidis E Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):1039-43. PubMed ID: 16318876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Making universal newborn hearing screening a success. Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Nikolopoulos T; Korres GS; Ferekidis E Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Feb; 70(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 16029898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Newborn hearing screening in a South African private health care hospital. Swanepoel D; Ebrahim S; Joseph A; Friedland PL Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 71(6):881-7. PubMed ID: 17382410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes and efficacy of newborn hearing screening: strengths and weaknesses (success or failure?). Korres S; Nikolopoulos TP; Peraki EE; Tsiakou M; Karakitsou M; Apostolopoulos N; Economides J; Balatsouras D; Ferekidis E Laryngoscope; 2008 Jul; 118(7):1253-6. PubMed ID: 18401271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening for early detection of permanent congenital hearing loss in Lagos, Nigeria. Olusanya BO; Wirz SL; Luxon LM Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):991-1001. PubMed ID: 18433883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The hearing screening program for newborns with otoacoustic emission for early detection of hearing loss]. Geal-Dor M; Levi H; Elidan Y; Arad I Harefuah; 2002 Jul; 141(7):586-90, 668. PubMed ID: 12187552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying congenital hearing impairment. Personal experience based on selective hearing screening. Molini E; Ricci G; Baroni S; Ciorba A; Bellocci A; Simoncelli C Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2004 Jun; 24(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 15584580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Universal newborn hearing screening: a 27-month experience in the French region of Champagne-Ardenne. Lévêque M; Schmidt P; Leroux B; Danvin JB; Langagne T; Labrousse M; Chays A Acta Paediatr; 2007 Aug; 96(8):1150-4. PubMed ID: 17578491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overcoming difficulties in implementing a universal newborn hearing screening program. Korres S; Balatsouras DG; Vlachou S; Kastanioudakis IG; Ziavra NV; Ferekidis E Turk J Pediatr; 2005; 47(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 16250303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of the number of averaged responses on the measurement of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions in newborns. Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Nikolopoulos T; Korres GS; Economou NC; Ferekidis E Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Mar; 70(3):429-33. PubMed ID: 16140396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions. Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 17804981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Follow-up default in a hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening programme in a low-income country. Olusanya BO Child Care Health Dev; 2009 Mar; 35(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 19228154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Universal hearing screening in the Champagne-Ardenne regions: results and consideration after 55 000 births from January 2004 to June 2007]. Langagne T; Schmidt P; Leveque M; Chays A Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2008; 129(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 19694157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefits and costs of universal hearing screening programme. Cao-Nguyen MH; Kos MI; Guyot JP Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Oct; 71(10):1591-5. PubMed ID: 17719096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An alternative strategy for universal infant hearing screening in tertiary hospitals with a high delivery rate, within a developing country, using transient evoked oto-acoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry. Mathur NN; Dhawan R J Laryngol Otol; 2007 Jul; 121(7):639-43. PubMed ID: 17112395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening. Korres SG; Balatsouras DG; Lyra C; Kandiloros D; Ferekidis E Med Sci Monit; 2006 Jun; 12(6):CR260-3. PubMed ID: 16733484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in hearing screening programs: protocol for developing countries. Bansal S; Gupta A; Nagarkar A Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jul; 72(7):1059-63. PubMed ID: 18479757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Otoacoustic emissions and tympanometry screening among 0-5 year olds. Ho V; Daly KA; Hunter LL; Davey C Laryngoscope; 2002 Mar; 112(3):513-9. PubMed ID: 12148864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using otoacoustic emissions to screen for hearing loss in early childhood care settings. Eiserman WD; Hartel DM; Shisler L; Buhrmann J; White KR; Foust T Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Apr; 72(4):475-82. PubMed ID: 18276019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]