BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16319621)

  • 1. Advanced bionics thin lateral and Helix II electrodes: a temporal bone study.
    Wright CG; Roland PS; Kuzma J
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Nov; 115(11):2041-5. PubMed ID: 16319621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
    Radeloff A; Mack M; Baghi M; Gstoettner WK; Adunka OF
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18090204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anatomy of the middle-turn cochleostomy.
    Isaacson B; Roland PS; Wright CG
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Dec; 118(12):2200-4. PubMed ID: 18948831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?
    Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 May; 126(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16698696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of the insertion-trauma of the Nucleus Contour Advance electrode-array in a human temporal bone model].
    Klenzner T; Richter B; Nagursky H; Schipper J; Laszig R; Aschendorff A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 Dec; 83(12):840-4. PubMed ID: 15611904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of cochlear damage with three perimodiolar electrode designs.
    Eshraghi AA; Yang NW; Balkany TJ
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Mar; 113(3):415-9. PubMed ID: 12616189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear implantation via the round window membrane minimizes trauma to cochlear structures: a histologically controlled insertion study.
    Adunka O; Unkelbach MH; Mack M; Hambek M; Gstoettner W; Kiefer J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 Sep; 124(7):807-12. PubMed ID: 15370564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Adunka O; Kiefer J; Unkelbach MH; Lehnert T; Gstoettner W
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jul; 114(7):1237-41. PubMed ID: 15235353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new cochlear implant electrode design for preservation of residual hearing: a temporal bone study.
    Skarzynski H; Podskarbi-Fayette R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Apr; 130(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 19883172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The internal dimensions of the cochlear scalae with special reference to cochlear electrode insertion trauma.
    Biedron S; Prescher A; Ilgner J; Westhofen M
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jul; 31(5):731-7. PubMed ID: 20142798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. II: Comparison of Spiral Clarion and HiFocus II electrodes.
    Wardrop P; Whinney D; Rebscher SJ; Luxford W; Leake P
    Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):68-79. PubMed ID: 15855031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an electrode prototype for atraumatic cochlear implantation in hearing preservation candidates: preliminary results from a temporal bone study.
    Helbig S; Settevendemie C; Mack M; Baumann U; Helbig M; Stöver T
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Apr; 32(3):419-23. PubMed ID: 21307807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal bone investigations on landmarks for conventional or endosteal insertion of cochlear electrodes.
    Pau HW; Just T; Dommerich S; Behrend D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):920-6. PubMed ID: 17712669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode.
    Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Xu J; Risi F; Svehla M; Cowan R; Stover T; Erfurt P; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():42-8. PubMed ID: 17063010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of electrode insertion depth on intracochlear trauma.
    Adunka O; Kiefer J
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Sep; 135(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 16949967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical trauma after sequential insertion of intracochlear catheters and electrode arrays (a histologic study).
    Ibrahim HN; Helbig S; Bossard D; Truy E
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Dec; 32(9):1448-54. PubMed ID: 22072260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating cochlear implant trauma to the scala vestibuli.
    Adunka O; Kiefer J; Unkelbach MH; Radeloff A; Gstoettner W
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2005 Apr; 30(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 15839863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Atraumaticity study of 2 cochlear implant electrode arrays.
    Manrique M; Picciafuoco S; Manrique R; Sanhueza I; Domínguez P; Pérez N; Zubieta JL; de Abajo J
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Apr; 35(4):619-28. PubMed ID: 24569795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A temporal bone study of insertion trauma and intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. I: Comparison of Nucleus banded and Nucleus Contour electrodes.
    Wardrop P; Whinney D; Rebscher SJ; Roland JT; Luxford W; Leake PA
    Hear Res; 2005 May; 203(1-2):54-67. PubMed ID: 15855030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisited.
    Roland PS; Wright CG; Isaacson B
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Aug; 117(8):1397-402. PubMed ID: 17585282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.