332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16319855)
41. Creative Commons ponders share options.
Gould P
Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7014):137. PubMed ID: 15538333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. PLoS stays afloat with bulk publishing.
Butler D
Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7200):11. PubMed ID: 18596768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Internet publishing camps renew hostilities.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2000 Jul; 406(6792):112. PubMed ID: 10910320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Double-blind review: the paw print is a giveaway.
Naqvi KR
Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7183):28. PubMed ID: 18322504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Five-point plan to revive and reform Indian science.
Lavania UC
Nature; 2007 Feb; 445(7127):484. PubMed ID: 17268449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The illusion of scientific objectivity and the death of the investigator.
Richardson ET; Polyakova A
Eur J Clin Invest; 2012 Feb; 42(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 21752023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Westernizing Eastern-bloc science.
Schiermeier Q
Nature; 2008 May; 453(7194):558-9. PubMed ID: 18589878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Free tips.
Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7063):1208. PubMed ID: 16251910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The web as originally intended.
Nat Cell Biol; 2005 Sep; 7(9):845. PubMed ID: 16136177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Dragging scientific publishing into the 21st century.
Khan R; Goodman L; Mittelman D
Genome Biol; 2014 Dec; 15(12):556. PubMed ID: 25517439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Three cheers for peers.
Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Competition in biology: it's a scoop!
Pearson H
Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):222-3. PubMed ID: 14628017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Impact factor and its role in academic promotion.
Brusasco V; Dinh-Xuan AT; Leff AR; Adler KB; Glenny RW; Dempsey JA; Levy ML; Panettieri R; Reddel HK; Singh D; Virchow JC
Eur Respir J; 2009 Dec; 34(6):1499-500. PubMed ID: 19948921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. No researcher is too junior to fix science.
Tregoning J
Nature; 2017 May; 545(7652):7. PubMed ID: 28470218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Focus on research: Deutsches Arzteblatt can look back on a long tradition of publishing original articles in medical science.
Ludwig S; Baethge C
Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2010 May; 107(18):317-9. PubMed ID: 20517529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
Oren GA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Pressure also leads to worthless publications.
de Carvalho LB
Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7078):784. PubMed ID: 16482133
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Scientific writing: the online cooperative.
Perkel JM
Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):127-8. PubMed ID: 25279924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Answering critics can add fuel to controversy.
Witten E
Nature; 2006 Nov; 444(7117):265. PubMed ID: 17108939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. How today's scientific culture affects young scientists.
Bischofberger M; Guarnera E
Bioessays; 2010 May; 32(5):369-71. PubMed ID: 20414893
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
