BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16319861)

  • 1. Automated grading of research performance clearly fails to measure up.
    Haeffner-Cavaillon N; Graillot-Gak C; Bréchot C
    Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7068):559. PubMed ID: 16319861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. n-index: a novel and easily-calculable parameter for comparison of researchers working in different scientific fields.
    Namazi MR; Fallahzadeh MK
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2010; 76(3):229-30. PubMed ID: 20445291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Achievement index climbs the ranks.
    Ball P
    Nature; 2007 Aug; 448(7155):737. PubMed ID: 17700666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How should research productivity be assessed in early career psychiatric researchers? research funding versus scientific productivity.
    de Leon J
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Sep; 70(9):1327-8; author reply 1328. PubMed ID: 19818260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The challenge of assessing the impact of science beyond bibliometrics.
    Barreto ML
    Rev Saude Publica; 2013 Aug; 47(4):834-7. PubMed ID: 24346673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Academic freedom. Thai science agency clamps down on sensitive research.
    Stone R
    Science; 2007 Dec; 318(5856):1537-8. PubMed ID: 18063762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reactions to the Hwang scandal.
    Kwok LS
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):606-7. PubMed ID: 16459362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scientific misconduct. Japan's universities take action.
    Normile D
    Science; 2007 Jan; 315(5808):26. PubMed ID: 17204614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A graduate student oath.
    Davis KD; Seeman MV; Chapman J; Rotstein OD
    Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5883):1587-8. PubMed ID: 18566266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conflict of interest. Stung by controversy, biomedical groups urge consistent guidelines.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2007 Jul; 317(5837):441. PubMed ID: 17656694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The performance of China's biomedical innovation: a scientometric analysis.
    Tang X; Du J
    Sci China Life Sci; 2016 Oct; 59(10):1074-1082. PubMed ID: 27437700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wellcome funding.
    Jayaraman KS
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7050):489. PubMed ID: 16089006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Past and future of the Revista de Investigación Clínica].
    Gamba G; García-Romero MT; Venado A
    Rev Invest Clin; 2008; 60(6):442-50. PubMed ID: 19408423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rising stars.
    Phillips N
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7613):S49. PubMed ID: 27463074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research conduct. Lessons of the stem cell scandal.
    Cho MK; McGee G; Magnus D
    Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5761):614-5. PubMed ID: 16456065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fewer numbers, better science.
    Benedictus R; Miedema F; Ferguson MW
    Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7626):453-455. PubMed ID: 27786219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An integrated approach to evaluate faculty members' research performance.
    Iyengar R; Wang Y; Chow J; Charney DS
    Acad Med; 2009 Nov; 84(11):1610-6. PubMed ID: 19858825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Just a handful of publications can collect the prize.
    Carbone M
    Nature; 2018 Sep; 561(7724):464. PubMed ID: 30258141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A measure of respect for translational research.
    Sharma A
    Science; 2007 Oct; 318(5849):391-3. PubMed ID: 17947565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical investigator.
    Clin Privil White Pap; 2008 Feb; (415):1-12. PubMed ID: 18441603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.