184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16319861)
21. Measures for measures.
Lehmann S; Jackson AD; Lautrup BE
Nature; 2006 Dec; 444(7122):1003-4. PubMed ID: 17183295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Research impact: Altmetrics make their mark.
Kwok R
Nature; 2013 Aug; 500(7463):491-3. PubMed ID: 23977678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics.
Hicks D; Wouters P; Waltman L; de Rijcke S; Rafols I
Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7548):429-31. PubMed ID: 25903611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomedical philanthropy: state of the donation.
Wadman M
Nature; 2007 May; 447(7142):248-50. PubMed ID: 17507953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Asking good clinical research questions and choosing the right study design.
Bragge P
Injury; 2010 Jul; 41 Suppl 1():S3-6. PubMed ID: 20466367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. We need negative metrics too.
Holbrook JB; Barr KR; Brown KW
Nature; 2013 May; 497(7450):439. PubMed ID: 23698435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Global overview.
Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7526):S56-7. PubMed ID: 25390143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Polish scientists among the most influential scientific minds in 2015.
Undas A; Wiesner-Spyrczyńska M
Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2016; 126(3):113-5. PubMed ID: 27026093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Computing giants launch free science metrics.
Butler D
Nature; 2011 Aug; 476(7358):18. PubMed ID: 21814253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Can research quality be estimated from journal titles?
Reeve J
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2006 May; 45(5):646-7. PubMed ID: 16490753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Why are there few publications by the Argentine gastroenterology? Considerations on a bibliometric analysis of Argentine publications on gastroenterology].
Barreyro FJ; Krabshuis J; Planzer del Campo M; Bai JC
Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam; 2009 Mar; 39(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 19408733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A possible way out of the impact-factor game.
Tse H
Nature; 2008 Aug; 454(7207):938-9. PubMed ID: 18719564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of the impact factor in biomedical research: its use and misuse.
Kumar V; Upadhyay S; Medhi B
Singapore Med J; 2009 Aug; 50(8):752-5. PubMed ID: 19710969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. H-index: however ranked, citations need context.
Wendl MC
Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7161):403. PubMed ID: 17898746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The importance of being earnest: the role of industry employees in studies about their products.
Saper CB
Ann Neurol; 2014 Jun; 75(6):803-4. PubMed ID: 24942598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Clone star admits lies over eggs.
Cyranoski D; Check E
Nature; 2005 Dec; 438(7068):536-7. PubMed ID: 16319847
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Altmetrics: Value all research products.
Piwowar H
Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7431):159. PubMed ID: 23302843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Key discoveries often originate with lone researchers.
Green SJ; Brendsel J
Nature; 2008 Nov; 456(7220):315. PubMed ID: 19020595
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. H-index: age and sex make it unreliable.
Kelly CD; Jennions MD
Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7161):403. PubMed ID: 17898745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Point/Counterpoint. The future h-index is an excellent way to predict scientists' future impact.
Acuna DE; Penner O; Orton CG
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):110601. PubMed ID: 24320407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
