413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16320092)
1. Effect of fMRI acoustic noise on non-auditory working memory task: comparison between continuous and pulsed sound emitting EPI.
Haller S; Bartsch AJ; Radue EW; Klarhöfer M; Seifritz E; Scheffler K
MAGMA; 2005 Nov; 18(5):263-71. PubMed ID: 16320092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Background MR gradient noise and non-auditory BOLD activations: a data-driven perspective.
Haller S; Homola GA; Scheffler K; Beckmann CF; Bartsch AJ
Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1282():74-83. PubMed ID: 19505438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. fMRI-acoustic noise alters brain activation during working memory tasks.
Tomasi D; Caparelli EC; Chang L; Ernst T
Neuroimage; 2005 Aug; 27(2):377-86. PubMed ID: 15893942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Continuous ASL perfusion fMRI investigation of higher cognition: quantification of tonic CBF changes during sustained attention and working memory tasks.
Kim J; Whyte J; Wang J; Rao H; Tang KZ; Detre JA
Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):376-85. PubMed ID: 16427324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhancing BOLD response in the auditory system by neurophysiologically tuned fMRI sequence.
Seifritz E; Di Salle F; Esposito F; Herdener M; Neuhoff JG; Scheffler K
Neuroimage; 2006 Feb; 29(3):1013-22. PubMed ID: 16253522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High efficiency multishot interleaved spiral-in/out: acquisition for high-resolution BOLD fMRI.
Jung Y; Samsonov AA; Liu TT; Buracas GT
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Aug; 70(2):420-8. PubMed ID: 23023395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural substrates associated with the concurrent performance of dual working memory tasks.
Yoo SS; Paralkar G; Panych LP
Int J Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 114(6):613-31. PubMed ID: 15204056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PHYCAA: data-driven measurement and removal of physiological noise in BOLD fMRI.
Churchill NW; Yourganov G; Spring R; Rasmussen PM; Lee W; Ween JE; Strother SC
Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1299-314. PubMed ID: 21871573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Self vs. other: neural correlates underlying agent identification based on unimodal auditory information as revealed by electrotomography (sLORETA).
Justen C; Herbert C; Werner K; Raab M
Neuroscience; 2014 Feb; 259():25-34. PubMed ID: 24295635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sound level dependence of auditory evoked potentials: simultaneous EEG recording and low-noise fMRI.
Thaerig S; Behne N; Schadow J; Lenz D; Scheich H; Brechmann A; Herrmann CS
Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Mar; 67(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 17707939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Males and females differ in brain activation during cognitive tasks.
Bell EC; Willson MC; Wilman AH; Dave S; Silverstone PH
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(2):529-38. PubMed ID: 16260156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Looping Star fMRI in Cognitive Tasks and Resting State.
Dionisio-Parra B; Wiesinger F; Sämann PG; Czisch M; Solana AB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Sep; 52(3):739-751. PubMed ID: 32073206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating the benefits of multi-echo EPI for fMRI at 7 T.
Poser BA; Norris DG
Neuroimage; 2009 May; 45(4):1162-72. PubMed ID: 19349231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of susceptibility gradients on cartesian and spiral EPI for BOLD fMRI.
Sangill R; Wallentin M; Østergaard L; Vestergaard-Poulsen P
MAGMA; 2006 Aug; 19(3):105-14. PubMed ID: 16823579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of spatial BOLD sensitivity variations in fMRI using gradient-echo field maps.
Mannfolk P; Wirestam R; Nilsson M; van Westen D; Ståhlberg F; Olsrud J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Sep; 28(7):947-56. PubMed ID: 20573463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scanning for the scanner: FMRI of audition by read-out omissions from echo-planar imaging.
Bartsch AJ; Homola G; Thesen S; Sahmer P; Keim R; Beckmann CF; Biller A; Knaus C; Bendszus M
Neuroimage; 2007 Mar; 35(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 17188900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. BOLD signal in memory paradigms in hippocampal region depends on echo time.
Milian M; Zeltner L; Klamer S; Klose U; Rona S; Erb M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 May; 37(5):1064-71. PubMed ID: 23124612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technical considerations for functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis.
Conklin CJ; Faro SH; Mohamed FB
Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2014 Nov; 24(4):695-704. PubMed ID: 25441508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing and compensating for zero-lag correlation effects in time-lagged Granger causality analysis of FMRI.
Deshpande G; Sathian K; Hu X
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 57(6):1446-56. PubMed ID: 20659822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. BOLD contrast sensitivity enhancement and artifact reduction with multiecho EPI: parallel-acquired inhomogeneity-desensitized fMRI.
Poser BA; Versluis MJ; Hoogduin JM; Norris DG
Magn Reson Med; 2006 Jun; 55(6):1227-35. PubMed ID: 16680688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
