These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16320145)

  • 21. Use of 35 words for evaluation of hearing loss in signal-to-babble ratio: A clinic protocol.
    Wilson RH; Burks CA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(6):839-52. PubMed ID: 16680621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Smits C; Houtgast T
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 17365067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
    Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A "Buildup" of Speech Intelligibility in Listeners With Normal Hearing and Hearing Loss.
    Best V; Swaminathan J; Kopčo N; Roverud E; Shinn-Cunningham B
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518807519. PubMed ID: 30353783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Takayanagi S; Dirks DD; Moshfegh A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Jun; 45(3):585-97. PubMed ID: 12069010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 in multi-talker babble: a preliminary report.
    Wilson RH; Strouse A
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2002; 39(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 11926322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.
    Bacon SP; Opie JM; Montoya DY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 41(3):549-63. PubMed ID: 9638921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners].
    He LP
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(1):29-31, 59. PubMed ID: 8352994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Localization in speech mixtures by listeners with hearing loss.
    Best V; Carlile S; Kopco N; van Schaik A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):EL210-15. PubMed ID: 21568377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of a speech enhancement strategy with normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Jamieson DG; Brennan RL; Cornelisse LE
    Ear Hear; 1995 Jun; 16(3):274-86. PubMed ID: 7672476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Detection and recognition of stop consonants by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Turner CW; Fabry DA; Barrett S; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Aug; 35(4):942-9. PubMed ID: 1405550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Morgan DE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 6747116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Homogeneity of the 18 QuickSIN lists.
    McArdle RA; Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Mar; 17(3):157-67. PubMed ID: 16646276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of aging on response criteria in speech-recognition tasks.
    Gordon-Salant S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 3724109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Arbogast TL; Mason CR; Kidd G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2169-80. PubMed ID: 15898658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of language experience on digit recognition by English and Chinese listeners.
    Zhou X; Yuan W; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Zhang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):EL324-8. PubMed ID: 26428834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.