BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16320264)

  • 1. Testing and estimation in flexible group sequential designs with adaptive treatment selection.
    Posch M; Koenig F; Branson M; Brannath W; Dunger-Baldauf C; Bauer P
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3697-714. PubMed ID: 16320264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive designs for confirmatory clinical trials.
    Bretz F; Koenig F; Brannath W; Glimm E; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(8):1181-217. PubMed ID: 19206095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of a parameter and its exact confidence interval following sequential sample size reestimation trials.
    Cheng Y; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 15606411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flexible design of two-stage adaptive procedures for phase III clinical trials.
    Koyama T
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jul; 28(4):500-13. PubMed ID: 17307399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of adaptive allocation rules for group-sequential binary response clinical trials.
    Morgan CC; Stephen Coad D
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1937-54. PubMed ID: 16981177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repeated confidence intervals for adaptive group sequential trials.
    Mehta CR; Bauer P; Posch M; Brannath W
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5422-33. PubMed ID: 17918195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the adaptive performance of flexible sample size designs with treatment difference in an interval.
    Liu GF; Zhu GR; Cui L
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):584-96. PubMed ID: 17634972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation in flexible two stage designs.
    Brannath W; König F; Bauer P
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3366-81. PubMed ID: 16220489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Data-driven analysis strategies for proportion studies in adaptive group sequential test designs.
    Wassmer G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):585-603. PubMed ID: 14584710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of methods for adaptive treatment selection.
    Friede T; Stallard N
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):767-81. PubMed ID: 18932136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preservation of effect and the regulatory approval of new treatments on the basis of non-inferiority trials.
    Snapinn S; Jiang Q
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(3):382-91. PubMed ID: 17914712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confirmatory adaptive designs with Bayesian decision tools for a targeted therapy in oncology.
    Brannath W; Zuber E; Branson M; Bretz F; Gallo P; Posch M; Racine-Poon A
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1445-63. PubMed ID: 19266565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive Dunnett tests for treatment selection.
    Koenig F; Brannath W; Bretz F; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1612-25. PubMed ID: 17876763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parameter estimation following an adaptive treatment selection trial design.
    Luo X; Wu SS; Xiong J
    Biom J; 2010 Dec; 52(6):823-35. PubMed ID: 21154898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An adaptive dose-finding design incorporating both toxicity and efficacy.
    Zhang W; Sargent DJ; Mandrekar S
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(14):2365-83. PubMed ID: 16220478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A clinical development paradigm for cancer vaccines and related biologics.
    Hoos A; Parmiani G; Hege K; Sznol M; Loibner H; Eggermont A; Urba W; Blumenstein B; Sacks N; Keilholz U; Nichol G;
    J Immunother; 2007 Jan; 30(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 17198079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Adaptive designs for clinical trial].
    Li W; He SJ; Wang Y; Cheng XR; Jia X
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 28(6):605-7. PubMed ID: 17939395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are flexible designs sound?
    Burman CF; Sonesson C
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):664-9; discussion 670-83. PubMed ID: 16984302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive design method based on sum of p-values.
    Chang M
    Stat Med; 2007 Jun; 26(14):2772-84. PubMed ID: 17133651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Issues in the use of adaptive clinical trial designs.
    Emerson SS
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3270-96; discussion 3302-4, 3320-5, 3326-47. PubMed ID: 16906553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.