254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16320277)
1. Dynamic balancing randomization in controlled clinical trials.
Heritier S; Gebski V; Pillai A
Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3729-41. PubMed ID: 16320277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of simulation to compare the performance of minimization with stratified blocked randomization.
Toorawa R; Adena M; Donovan M; Jones S; Conlon J
Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):264-78. PubMed ID: 18756580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation.
Han B; Enas NH; McEntegart D
Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(27):3329-46. PubMed ID: 19739238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Studywise minimization: a treatment allocation method that improves balance among treatment groups and makes allocation unpredictable.
Perry M; Faes M; Reelick MF; Olde Rikkert MG; Borm GF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1118-22. PubMed ID: 20304606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sequentially adjusted randomization to force balance in controlled trials with unknown prevalence of covariates: application to alcoholism research.
Müller MJ; Scheurich A; Wetzel H; Szegedi A; Hautzinger M
Alcohol Alcohol; 2005; 40(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 15642723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.
Hagino A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I; Ohashi Y; Sakamoto J; Nakazato H
Control Clin Trials; 2004 Dec; 25(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 15588744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible.
Schouten HJ
Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1529-35. PubMed ID: 8589238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The distribution of loss in two-treatment biased-coin designs.
Atkinson AC
Biostatistics; 2003 Apr; 4(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 12925515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.
Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preserving the allocation ratio at every allocation with biased coin randomization and minimization in studies with unequal allocation.
Kuznetsova OM; Tymofyeyev Y
Stat Med; 2012 Apr; 31(8):701-23. PubMed ID: 22161821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial.
Weir CJ; Lees KR
Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(5):705-26. PubMed ID: 12587101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Treatment by drawing lots in a therapeutic trial with a balance distribution of prognostic factors: the minimization method].
Mollié A; Hill C
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1988; 36(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 3045921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomization with a posteriori constraints: description and properties.
Gicquel S; Marion-Gallois R
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5033-45. PubMed ID: 17721873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomization procedures in orthopaedic trials.
Randelli P; Arrigoni P; Lubowitz JH; Cabitza P; Denti M
Arthroscopy; 2008 Jul; 24(7):834-8. PubMed ID: 18589273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of randomization techniques for clinical trials with data from the HOMERUS-trial.
Verberk WJ; Kroon AA; Kessels AG; Nelemans PJ; Van Ree JW; Lenders JW; Thien T; Bakx JC; Van Montfrans GA; Smit AJ; Beltman FW; De Leeuw PW
Blood Press; 2005; 14(5):306-14. PubMed ID: 16257877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sequential balancing: a simple method for treatment allocation in clinical trials.
Borm GF; Hoogendoorn EH; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA
Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Dec; 26(6):637-45. PubMed ID: 16226925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inefficiency of randomization methods that balance on stratum margins and improvements with permuted blocks and a sequential method.
Kaiser LD
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(16):1699-706. PubMed ID: 22437508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic treatment allocation adjusting for prognostic factors for more than two treatments.
Dror S; Faraggi D; Reiser B
Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1338-43. PubMed ID: 8589225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Studies with group treatments required special power calculations, allocation methods, and statistical analyses.
Faes MC; Reelick MF; Perry M; Olde Rikkert MG; Borm GF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 65(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 21856120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Balancing multiple baseline characteristics in randomized clinical trials.
Su Z
Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Jul; 32(4):547-50. PubMed ID: 21382510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
