253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16320277)
21. [Introduction of dynamic balancing randomization method and its application].
Liu ZL; Liu BQ; Li LH; Liu JP
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao; 2011 Mar; 9(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 21419076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. IRINI: random group allocation of multiple prognostic factors.
Kasturi J; Geisler JG; Liu J; Kirchner T; Amaratunga D; Lubomirski M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 May; 32(3):372-81. PubMed ID: 21187163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Pseudo cluster randomization dealt with selection bias and contamination in clinical trials.
Teerenstra S; Melis RJ; Peer PG; Borm GF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 59(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 16549260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Minimization method for balancing continuous prognostic variables between treatment and control groups using Kullback-Leibler divergence.
Endo A; Nagatani F; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
Contemp Clin Trials; 2006 Oct; 27(5):420-31. PubMed ID: 16807130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative evaluation of balancing properties of stratified randomization procedures.
Kundt G
Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19283309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparisons of minimization and Atkinson's algorithm.
Senn S; Anisimov VV; Fedorov VV
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):721-30. PubMed ID: 20213718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Randomizing research participants: promoting balance and concealment in small samples.
Matthews EE; Cook PF; Terada M; Aloia MS
Res Nurs Health; 2010 Jun; 33(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 20499394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sample size re-estimation in cluster randomization trials.
Lake S; Kammann E; Klar N; Betensky R
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1337-50. PubMed ID: 12185888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Conditional analysis of mixed Poisson processes with baseline counts: implications for trial design and analysis.
Cook RJ; Wei W
Biostatistics; 2003 Jul; 4(3):479-94. PubMed ID: 12925513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Approaches to expanding the two-arm biased coin randomization to unequal allocation while preserving the unconditional allocation ratio.
Kuznetsova OM; Johnson VP
Stat Med; 2017 Jul; 36(16):2483-2498. PubMed ID: 28337776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers.
Doig GS; Simpson F
J Crit Care; 2005 Jun; 20(2):187-91; discussion 191-3. PubMed ID: 16139163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantifying the exact allocation ratios in randomized clinical trials with biased coin randomization.
Lin Y; Su Z
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Oct; 108(1):197-202. PubMed ID: 22607968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The "best balance" allocation led to optimal balance in cluster-controlled trials.
de Hoop E; Teerenstra S; van Gaal BG; Moerbeek M; Borm GF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 65(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 21840173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Allocation of patients to conditions in headache clinical trials: randomization, stratification, and treatment matching.
Lipchik GL; Nicholson RA; Penzien DB
Headache; 2005 May; 45(5):419-28. PubMed ID: 15953258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Balancing continuous covariates based on Kernel densities.
Ma Z; Hu F
Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Mar; 34(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 23270935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Adaptive biased-coin designs for skewing the allocation proportion in clinical trials with normal responses.
Atkinson AC; Biswas A
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(16):2477-92. PubMed ID: 16007571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A note on non-parametric ANCOVA for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials.
Lesaffre E; Senn S
Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(23):3583-96. PubMed ID: 14652862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of unstratified and centre-stratified randomization in multi-centre clinical trials.
Anisimov VV
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 20112277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Balancing treatment allocations by clinician or center in randomized trials allows unacceptable levels of treatment prediction.
Hills RK; Gray R; Wheatley K
J Evid Based Med; 2009 Aug; 2(3):196-204. PubMed ID: 21349013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Expansion of the modified Zelen's approach randomization and dynamic randomization with partial block supplies at the centers to unequal allocation.
Kuznetsova OM; Tymofyeyev Y
Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Nov; 32(6):962-72. PubMed ID: 21888990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
