These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16320277)

  • 41. Quantification methods were developed for selection bias by predictability of allocations with unequal block randomization.
    Dupin-Spriet T; Fermanian J; Spriet A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Dec; 58(12):1269-76. PubMed ID: 16291471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of dynamic block randomization and minimization in randomized trials: a simulation study.
    Xiao L; Lavori PW; Wilson SR; Ma J
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 21335590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. RandoWeb, an online randomization tool for clinical trials.
    Morice V
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Aug; 107(2):308-14. PubMed ID: 22133716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A generic minimization random allocation and blinding system on web.
    Cai H; Xia J; Xu D; Gao D; Yan Y
    J Biomed Inform; 2006 Dec; 39(6):706-19. PubMed ID: 16616696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Weighted re-randomization tests for minimization with unbalanced allocation.
    Han B; Yu M; McEntegart D
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):243-53. PubMed ID: 23760923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Should minimization replace randomization in all clinical trials?
    Tugwell P; Knottnerus JA; Idzerda L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22083018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Pseudo cluster randomization: a treatment allocation method to minimize contamination and selection bias.
    Borm GF; Melis RJ; Teerenstra S; Peer PG
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(23):3535-47. PubMed ID: 16007575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A hybrid approach to achieving both marginal and conditional balances for stratification variables in sequential clinical trials.
    Lin Y; Su Z
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(5):275-81. PubMed ID: 23897862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Designing for cancer clinical trials: selection of prognostic factors.
    Brown BW
    Cancer Treat Rep; 1980; 64(2-3):499-502. PubMed ID: 7407790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A method to estimate the variance of an endpoint from an on-going blinded trial.
    Xing B; Ganju J
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(12):1807-14. PubMed ID: 15803440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Selecting a randomization method for a multi-center clinical trial with stochastic recruitment considerations.
    Sverdlov O; Ryeznik Y; Anisimov V; Kuznetsova OM; Knight R; Carter K; Drescher S; Zhao W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Feb; 24(1):52. PubMed ID: 38418968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Randomization in substance abuse clinical trials.
    Hedden SL; Woolson RF; Malcolm RJ
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2006 Feb; 1():6. PubMed ID: 16722591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Predicting event times in clinical trials when randomization is masked and blocked.
    Donovan JM; Elliott MR; Heitjan DF
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 17942464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Individual allocation had an advantage over cluster randomization in statistical efficiency in some circumstances.
    Hewitt CE; Torgerson DJ; Miles JN
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):1004-8. PubMed ID: 18411038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Eliminating bias in randomized controlled trials: importance of allocation concealment and masking.
    Viera AJ; Bangdiwala SI
    Fam Med; 2007 Feb; 39(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 17273956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The pursuit of balance: An overview of covariate-adaptive randomization techniques in clinical trials.
    Lin Y; Zhu M; Su Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):21-5. PubMed ID: 26244705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Dynamic comparison of Kaplan-Meier proportions: monitoring a randomized clinical trial with a long-term binary endpoint.
    Brittain E; Follmann D; Yang S
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 17680830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Generalized multidimensional dynamic allocation method.
    Lebowitsch J; Ge Y; Young B; Hu F
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(28):3537-44. PubMed ID: 22736449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Quantitative comparison of randomization designs in sequential clinical trials based on treatment balance and allocation randomness.
    Zhao W; Weng Y; Wu Q; Palesch Y
    Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 21544929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.