233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16320690)
1. [Laboratory control over warfarin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome].
Baluda MV; Lopukhina MV; Fomina VM; Lopukhin VO
Ter Arkh; 2005; 77(10):68-71. PubMed ID: 16320690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Standardization of coagulation tests.
Opartkiattikul N
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999; 30 Suppl 3():79-85. PubMed ID: 10926265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality assurance program for whole blood prothrombin time-international normalized ratio point-of-care monitors used for patient self-testing to control oral anticoagulation.
Tripodi A; Bressi C; Carpenedo M; Chantarangkul V; Clerici M; Mannucci PM
Thromb Res; 2004; 113(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15081563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between CoaguChek S- and Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring anticoagulant therapy.
Jonsson M; Hillarp A; Svensson P
Thromb Res; 2004; 114(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 15306149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Results of the performance verification of the CoaguChek XS system.
Plesch W; Wolf T; Breitenbeck N; Dikkeschei LD; Cervero A; Perez PL; van den Besselaar AM
Thromb Res; 2008; 123(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 18585761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison and evaluation of a Point-of-care device (CoaguChek XS) to Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin.
Wieloch M; Hillarp A; Strandberg K; Nilsson C; Svensson PJ
Thromb Res; 2009 Jul; 124(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 19423152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Point-of-care testing of the international normalized ratio in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies.
Perry SL; Samsa GP; Ortel TL
Thromb Haemost; 2005 Dec; 94(6):1196-202. PubMed ID: 16411394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. INR comparison between the CoaguChek Pro PT(N) and a standard laboratory method.
Khoschnewis S; Hannes FM; Tschopp M; Wuillemin WA
Thromb Res; 2004; 113(5):327-32. PubMed ID: 15183045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Relationship between prothrombin time international normalized ratio and thrombo test (%)].
Numata Y; Ogata Y; Arao K; Mizumasa Y; Wakita T; Haruguchi H; Araki H; Tsuji T; Mawatari K; Shimada K
J Cardiol; 2001 Dec; 38(6):327-35. PubMed ID: 11806090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Point-of-care monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children. Comparison of the CoaguChek XS system with venous INR and venous INR using an International Reference Thromboplastin preparation (rTF/95).
Greenway A; Ignjatovic V; Summerhayes R; Newall F; Burgess J; DeRosa L; Monagle P
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jul; 102(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 19572081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Capillary whole blood testing by a new portable monitor. Comparison with standard determination of the international normalized ratio.
de Miguel D; Burgaleta C; Reyes E; Pascual T
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Jul; 120(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 12866369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of laboratory and portable monitor international normalized ratio determinations. Comparison with a criterion standard.
Kaatz SS; White RH; Hill J; Mascha E; Humphries JE; Becker DM
Arch Intern Med; 1995 Sep; 155(17):1861-7. PubMed ID: 7677552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and clinical impact of the normalization of the prothrombin times in oral anticoagulant control.
Loeliger EA; van den Besselaar AM; Lewis SM
Thromb Haemost; 1985 Feb; 53(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 3992514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low-molecular-weight heparin may alter point-of-care assay for international normalized ratio.
Phillips EM; Buchan DA; Newman N; Rajan A; Zia S
Pharmacotherapy; 2005 Oct; 25(10):1341-7. PubMed ID: 16185178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of the CoaguChek XS for point-of-care international normalized ratio (INR) measurement in children requiring warfarin.
Bauman ME; Black KL; Massicotte MP; Bauman ML; Kuhle S; Howlett-Clyne S; Cembrowski GS; Bajzar L
Thromb Haemost; 2008 Jun; 99(6):1097-103. PubMed ID: 18521514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardizing the prothrombin time. Calibrating coagulation instruments as well as thromboplastin.
Becker DM; Humphries JE; Walker FB; DeMong LK; Bopp JS; Acker MN
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Jun; 117(6):602-5. PubMed ID: 8503731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implications of use of low international sensitivity index thromboplastins in prothrombin time testing.
Ts'ao C; Swedlund J; Neofotistos D
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1994 Dec; 118(12):1183-7. PubMed ID: 7979911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Point-of-care (POCT) prothrombin time monitors: is a periodical control of their performance useful?
Barcellona D; Fenu L; Cornacchini S; Marongiu F
Thromb Res; 2009 Mar; 123(5):775-9. PubMed ID: 18814903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Oral anticoagulant monitoring by laboratory or near-patient testing: what a clinician should be aware of.
Tripodi A; Breukink-Engbers WG; van den Besselaar AM
Semin Vasc Med; 2003 Aug; 3(3):243-54. PubMed ID: 15199457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. INR comparison between the CoaguChek S and a standard laboratory method among patients with self-management of oral anticoagulation.
Hentrich DP; Fritschi J; Müller PR; Wuillemin WA
Thromb Res; 2007; 119(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 16765423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
