These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16320767)

  • 1. [Are expert's reports of disputed paternity supported by classical serology methods--sense or nonsense?].
    Raczek E
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 16320767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Paternity exclusion tests in the Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Medical Sciences in Poznan].
    Koralewska-Kordel M; Kordel K; Przybylski Z; Wiśniewski SA
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2006; 56(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 17249373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Mono- and dizygotic twins in forensic paternity testing in practice at the Department of Forensic Medicine (Silesian Academy of Medicine, Katowice) in the years 1996-2003].
    Raczek E
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2004; 54(2-3):107-15. PubMed ID: 15495555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Paternity contradiction cases in the practice of Department of Forensic Medicine of Silesian Academy of Medicine in years: 1985, 1990, 1995 and 1996-2000].
    Raczek E
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2002; 52(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 14669668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disputable paternity expertises in the material of the Department of Forensic Medicine Medical Academy of Białystok.
    Janica J; Koc-Zórawska E; Pepiński W; Skawrońska M; Niemcunowicz-Janica A
    Rocz Akad Med Bialymst; 2000; 45():122-32. PubMed ID: 11712423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Status of and means for improving expertise in disputed paternity].
    Tomilin VV; Gladkikh AS
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1985; 28(2):29-32. PubMed ID: 4024193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Andrologic expert assessment. Experiences and results of 40 years].
    Schirren C; Ied H
    Fortschr Med; 1992 Jun; 110(16):293-7. PubMed ID: 1634170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Blood group expertise in the clarification of disputed paternity].
    Hummel K
    Fortschr Med; 1975 Oct; 93(28):1354-9. PubMed ID: 1228091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The use of biostatistical analysis in the expertise of disputed paternity].
    Ol'khovik VP; Acherkan NN
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1990; 33(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 2080531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Usefulness of evaluating the probability of homozygotism with regard to the Dd features of the Rh system in the father in comparison with the homozygotism of the child in cases of disputed paternity].
    Garbalińska G
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1982; 28():235-48. PubMed ID: 6820238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Intoxication as an "ever lasting problem"].
    Kłys M
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2003; 53(3):235-47. PubMed ID: 14669721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence.
    Levett LM; Kovera MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Aug; 32(4):363-74. PubMed ID: 17940854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Biostatistics as a basis of forensic determination of paternity].
    Hummel K
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1969; 25():90-6. PubMed ID: 5821401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [On the work of Austrian authorised experts on procedures in custodial and visiting rights--a survey of current practice from the parents and children view].
    Vöelkl-Kernstock S; Bein N; Gutschner D; Klicpera C; Ponocny-Seliger E; Friedrich MH
    Neuropsychiatr; 2008; 22(4):268-76. PubMed ID: 19080998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Problems and solutions in giving an expert evaluation].
    Martin M
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2006 Mar; 113(3):105-6. PubMed ID: 16669192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of death qualification and need for cognition in venirepersons' evaluations of expert scientific testimony in capital trials.
    Butler B; Moran G
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):561-71. PubMed ID: 17440900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Expert's opinion in civil proceedings for damages in cases relating to hospital infections, especially to hepatitis B and C infections].
    Chowaniec C
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(4):251-6. PubMed ID: 16498962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Conclusions in expert testimony on disputed paternity].
    Potapov MI; Barsegiants LO; Sakharov RS; Kuprina TA
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1986; 29(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 3961859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [SUPPLEMENTARY LG Y/X TABLES FOR DETERMINING PATERNITY PROBABILITY IN SEROLOGICAL EXPERT TESTIMONY].
    HUMMEL K
    Z Immunitats Allergieforsch; 1963 Oct; 125():277-84. PubMed ID: 14117563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The problem of evasive testimony: the expert "waffle".
    Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 17389354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.