223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16322514)
1. The effects of dominance, regular inbreeding and sampling design on Q(ST), an estimator of population differentiation for quantitative traits.
Goudet J; Büchi L
Genetics; 2006 Feb; 172(2):1337-47. PubMed ID: 16322514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The joint effects of selection and dominance on the QST - FST contrast.
Santure AW; Wang J
Genetics; 2009 Jan; 181(1):259-76. PubMed ID: 18984567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of neutral nonadditive gene action on the quantitative index of population divergence.
López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
Genetics; 2003 Aug; 164(4):1627-33. PubMed ID: 12930766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental demonstration of a causal relationship between heterogeneity of selection and genetic differentiation in quantitative traits.
Porcher E; Giraud T; Goldringer I; Lavigne C
Evolution; 2004 Jul; 58(7):1434-45. PubMed ID: 15341147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Molecular and quantitative genetic divergence among populations of house mice with known evolutionary histories.
Morgan TJ; Evans MA; Garland T; Swallow JG; Carter PA
Heredity (Edinb); 2005 May; 94(5):518-25. PubMed ID: 15741999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. F(ST) and Q(ST) under neutrality.
Miller JR; Wood BP; Hamilton MB
Genetics; 2008 Oct; 180(2):1023-37. PubMed ID: 18780742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Testing for spatially divergent selection: comparing QST to FST.
Whitlock MC; Guillaume F
Genetics; 2009 Nov; 183(3):1055-63. PubMed ID: 19687138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Generalization of the Q
Cubry P; Scotti I; Oddou-Muratorio S; Lefèvre F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):e76-e83. PubMed ID: 28681534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. If F(ST) does not measure neutral genetic differentiation, then comparing it with Q(ST) is misleading. Or is it?
Edelaar P; Björklund M
Mol Ecol; 2011 May; 20(9):1805-12. PubMed ID: 21410574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genetic variability at neutral markers, quantitative trait land trait in a subdivided population under selection.
Le Corre V; Kremer A
Genetics; 2003 Jul; 164(3):1205-19. PubMed ID: 12871925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adaptive genetic differentiation in a predominantly self-pollinating species analyzed by transplanting into natural environment, crossbreeding and Q(ST)-F(ST) test.
Volis S
New Phytol; 2011 Oct; 192(1):237-248. PubMed ID: 21729087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The contribution of dominance to the understanding of quantitative genetic variation.
Wellmann R; Bennewitz J
Genet Res (Camb); 2011 Apr; 93(2):139-54. PubMed ID: 21481291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distinguishing adaptive from nonadaptive genetic differentiation: comparison of Q(ST) and F(ST) at two spatial scales.
Volis S; Yakubov B; Shulgina I; Ward D; Mendlinger S
Heredity (Edinb); 2005 Dec; 95(6):466-75. PubMed ID: 16189543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian models with dominance effects for genomic evaluation of quantitative traits.
Wellmann R; Bennewitz J
Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Feb; 94(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 22353246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Divergent selection as revealed by P(ST) and QTL-based F(ST) in three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) populations along a coastal-inland gradient.
Raeymaekers JA; Van Houdt JK; Larmuseau MH; Geldof S; Volckaert FA
Mol Ecol; 2007 Feb; 16(4):891-905. PubMed ID: 17284219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evolutionary inference from QST.
Whitlock MC
Mol Ecol; 2008 Apr; 17(8):1885-96. PubMed ID: 18363667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dominance genetic variance for traits under directional selection in Drosophila serrata.
Sztepanacz JL; Blows MW
Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):371-84. PubMed ID: 25783700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The change in quantitative genetic variation with inbreeding.
Van Buskirk J; Willi Y
Evolution; 2006 Dec; 60(12):2428-34. PubMed ID: 17263106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons for natural populations meaningful?
Pujol B; Wilson AJ; Ross RI; Pannell JR
Mol Ecol; 2008 Nov; 17(22):4782-5. PubMed ID: 19140971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of selection and drift on G matrix evolution in a heterogeneous environment: a multivariate Qst-Fst Test with the freshwater snail Galba truncatula.
Chapuis E; Martin G; Goudet J
Genetics; 2008 Dec; 180(4):2151-61. PubMed ID: 18854589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
