BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16322612)

  • 1. Level of evidence in orthopaedic journals.
    Obremskey WT; Pappas N; Attallah-Wasif E; Tornetta P; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Dec; 87(12):2632-2638. PubMed ID: 16322612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interobserver agreement in the application of levels of evidence to scientific papers in the American volume of the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
    Bhandari M; Swiontkowski MF; Einhorn TA; Tornetta P; Schemitsch EH; Leece P; Sprague S; Wright JG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Aug; 86(8):1717-20. PubMed ID: 15292420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The levels of evidence in pediatric orthopaedic journals: where are we now?
    Cashin MS; Kelley SP; Douziech JR; Varghese RA; Hamilton QP; Mulpuri K
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2011 Sep; 31(6):721-5. PubMed ID: 21841452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Level of evidence in Spine compared to other orthopedic journals.
    Wupperman R; Davis R; Obremskey WT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Feb; 32(3):388-93. PubMed ID: 17268275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Levels of Evidence in the Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics: Update and Comparison to the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
    Murphy RF; Cibulas AM; Sawyer JR; Spence DD; Kelly DM
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2015; 35(7):779-81. PubMed ID: 25412071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Have levels of evidence improved the quality of orthopaedic research?
    Cunningham BP; Harmsen S; Kweon C; Patterson J; Waldrop R; McLaren A; McLemore R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Nov; 471(11):3679-86. PubMed ID: 23846606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The validity of level of evidence ratings of articles submitted to JBJS.
    Hussain N; Yankanah R; Wright JG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Jan; 97(2):e8. PubMed ID: 25609447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Levels of evidence in foot and ankle surgery literature: progress from 2000 to 2010?
    Zaidi R; Abbassian A; Cro S; Guha A; Cullen N; Singh D; Goldberg A
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Aug; 94(15):e1121-10. PubMed ID: 22855001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of research and level of evidence in foot and ankle publications.
    Barske HL; Baumhauer J
    Foot Ankle Int; 2012 Jan; 33(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22381229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the level of evidence in the orthopaedic literature, 2013-2018: a review of 3449 articles in leading orthopaedic journals.
    Luksameearunothai K; Chaudhry Y; Thamyongkit S; Jia X; Hasenboehler EA
    Patient Saf Surg; 2020; 14():23. PubMed ID: 32467732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Levels of Evidence in Orthopaedic Trauma Literature.
    Scheschuk JP; Mostello AJ; Lombardi NJ; Maltenfort MG; Freedman KB; Tjoumakaris FP
    J Orthop Trauma; 2016 Jul; 30(7):362-6. PubMed ID: 27322200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Level of evidence trends in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1980-2010.
    Reich MS; Shaw J; Barrett I; Goldberg VM; Schnaser E
    Iowa Orthop J; 2014; 34():197-203. PubMed ID: 25328482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of scientific articles published in two general orthopaedic journals.
    Holzer LA; Holzer G
    Acta Ortop Bras; 2013; 21(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 24453683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
    Poolman RW; Struijs PA; Krips R; Sierevelt IN; Lutz KH; Bhandari M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16965628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increase in quality and quantity of orthopaedic studies from 2002 to 2012.
    Little Z; Newman S; Dodds A; Spicer D
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2015 Dec; 23(3):375-8. PubMed ID: 26715722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement are Unsatisfactory When Determining Abstract Study Design and Level of Evidence.
    Patel NM; Schmitz MR; Bastrom TP; Ghag R; Janicki JA; Kushare IV; Lewis R; Mistovich RJ; Nelson SE; Sawyer JR; Vanderhave KL; Wallace MJ; McKay SD
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2022 Jul; 42(6):e696-e700. PubMed ID: 35667059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Level of evidence of clinical spinal research and its correlation with journal impact factor.
    Amiri AR; Kanesalingam K; Cro S; Casey AT
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1148-53. PubMed ID: 23806347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variability of Reviewers' Comments in the Peer Review Process for Orthopaedic Research.
    Iantorno SE; Andras LM; Skaggs DL
    Spine Deform; 2016 Jul; 4(4):268-271. PubMed ID: 27927515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hip surgery and its evidence base: progress over a decade?
    Hasan K; Shankar S; Sharma A; Carter A; Zaidi R; Cro S; Skinner J; Goldberg A
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2016 Dec; 17(4):291-295. PubMed ID: 27443626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.