211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16323750)
1. Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy?
Dobesova K; Apt J; Lave LB
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(22):8578-83. PubMed ID: 16323750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions.
Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):9838-45. PubMed ID: 22888978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should a coal-fired power plant be replaced or retrofitted?
Patiño-Echeverri D; Morel B; Apt J; Chen C
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Dec; 41(23):7980-6. PubMed ID: 18186326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Baseload coal investment decisions under uncertain carbon legislation.
Bergerson JA; Lave LB
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 May; 41(10):3431-6. PubMed ID: 17547159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Emissions impacts of wind and energy storage in a market environment.
Sioshansi R
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Dec; 45(24):10728-35. PubMed ID: 22044253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic Management of NOx and SO2 Emissions in the Texas and Mid-Atlantic Electric Power Systems and Implications for Air Quality.
McDonald-Buller E; Kimura Y; Craig M; McGaughey G; Allen D; Webster M
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(3):1611-9. PubMed ID: 26727552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Costs for integrating wind into the future ERCOT system with related costs for savings in CO2 emissions.
Lu X; McElroy MB; Sluzas NA
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(7):3160-6. PubMed ID: 21375280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Emissions reductions from expanding state-level renewable portfolio standards.
Johnson JX; Novacheck J
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 May; 49(9):5318-25. PubMed ID: 25884101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electricity from fossil fuels without CO2 emissions: assessing the costs of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration in U.S. electricity markets.
Johnson TL; Keith DW
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Oct; 51(10):1452-9. PubMed ID: 11686250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.
Whittington HW
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1653-68. PubMed ID: 12460490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Opportunity for offshore wind to reduce future demand for coal-fired power plants in China with consequent savings in emissions of CO2.
Lu X; McElroy MB; Chen X; Kang C
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14764-71. PubMed ID: 25409413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reassessing the Efficiency Penalty from Carbon Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants.
Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 49(20):12576-84. PubMed ID: 26422409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regional air quality management aspects of climate change: impact of climate mitigation options on regional air emissions.
Rudokas J; Miller PJ; Trail MA; Russell AG
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(8):5170-7. PubMed ID: 25803240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economics of an integrated approach to control SO2, NOX, HCl, and particulate emissions from power plants.
Shemwell BE; Ergut A; Levendis YA
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 May; 52(5):521-34. PubMed ID: 12022692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatially and Temporally Resolved Analysis of Environmental Trade-Offs in Electricity Generation.
Peer RA; Garrison JB; Timms CP; Sanders KT
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(8):4537-45. PubMed ID: 26967826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Water impacts of CO2 emission performance standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants.
Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(20):11769-76. PubMed ID: 25229670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The cost of carbon capture and storage for natural gas combined cycle power plants.
Rubin ES; Zhai H
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(6):3076-84. PubMed ID: 22332665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling the effects of changes in new source review on national SO2 and NOx emissions from electricity-generating units.
Evans DA; Hobbs BF; Oren C; Palmer KL
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jan; 42(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 18284129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of potential carbon dioxide reductions due to biomass-coal cofiring in the United States.
Robinson AL; Rhodes JS; Keith DW
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(22):5081-9. PubMed ID: 14655692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
