These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16323751)

  • 1. Environmental effects of interstate power trading on electricity consumption mixes.
    Marriott J; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(22):8584-90. PubMed ID: 16323751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.
    Whittington HW
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1653-68. PubMed ID: 12460490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hourly marginal electricity mixes and their relevance for assessing the environmental performance of installations with variable load or power.
    Peters JF; Iribarren D; Juez Martel P; Burguillo M
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Oct; 843():156963. PubMed ID: 35764158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A sustainable solution for electricity crisis in Pakistan: opportunities, barriers, and policy implications for 100% renewable energy.
    Shah SAA; Solangi YA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Oct; 26(29):29687-29703. PubMed ID: 31407263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmental implications of United States coal exports: a comparative life cycle assessment of future power system scenarios.
    Bohnengel B; Patiño-Echeverri D; Bergerson J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9908-16. PubMed ID: 25025127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of fossil-fuel power plant emissions on the surface fine particulate matter in the Seoul Capital Area, South Korea.
    Kim BU; Kim O; Kim HC; Kim S
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Sep; 66(9):863-73. PubMed ID: 27389997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is There a Future for Nuclear Power? Wind and Emission Reduction Targets in Fossil-Fuel Alberta.
    van Kooten GC; Duan J; Lynch R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0165822. PubMed ID: 27902712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation.
    Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Sep; 41(17):6290-6. PubMed ID: 17937317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic input-output life-cycle assessment of trade between Canada and the United States.
    Norman J; Charpentier AD; MacLean HL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(5):1523-32. PubMed ID: 17396636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Life-cycle consequences of internalising socio-environmental externalities of power generation.
    García-Gusano D; Istrate IR; Iribarren D
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jan; 612():386-391. PubMed ID: 28858749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transaction decision optimization of new electricity market based on virtual power plant participation and Stackelberg game.
    Yang J
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0284030. PubMed ID: 37079540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health risks of energy systems.
    Krewitt W; Hurley F; Trukenmüller A; Friedrich R
    Risk Anal; 1998 Aug; 18(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 9775447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electricity generation and health.
    Markandya A; Wilkinson P
    Lancet; 2007 Sep; 370(9591):979-90. PubMed ID: 17876910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regional air quality management aspects of climate change: impact of climate mitigation options on regional air emissions.
    Rudokas J; Miller PJ; Trail MA; Russell AG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(8):5170-7. PubMed ID: 25803240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The environmental impacts and the carbon intensity of geothermal energy: A case study on the Hellisheiði plant.
    Paulillo A; Striolo A; Lettieri P
    Environ Int; 2019 Dec; 133(Pt B):105226. PubMed ID: 31639599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two U.S. power-plant carbon dioxide emissions data sets.
    Ackerman KV; Sundquist ET
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Aug; 42(15):5688-93. PubMed ID: 18754494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Critical review: Uncharted waters? The future of the electricity-water nexus.
    Sanders KT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jan; 49(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 25486256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Economical and environmental impacts of decarbonisation of Indonesian power sector.
    Indra Al Irsyad M; Halog A; Nepal R; Koesrindartoto DP
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 259():109669. PubMed ID: 32072944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Environmental impact assessment of a WtE plant after structural upgrade measures.
    Passarini F; Nicoletti M; Ciacci L; Vassura I; Morselli L
    Waste Manag; 2014 Apr; 34(4):753-62. PubMed ID: 24484765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Life cycle assessment and grid electricity: what do we know and what can we know?
    Weber CL; Jiaramillo P; Marriott J; Samaras C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1895-901. PubMed ID: 20131782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.