These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16324069)

  • 1. Statistical methods for assessing agreement for ordinal data.
    Jakobsson U; Westergren A
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2005 Dec; 19(4):427-31. PubMed ID: 16324069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical presentation and analysis of ordinal data in nursing research.
    Jakobsson U
    Scand J Caring Sci; 2004 Dec; 18(4):437-40. PubMed ID: 15598252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter- and intra-observer (dis)agreement among nurses and doctors to classify colour and exudation of open surgical wounds according to the Red-Yellow-Black scheme.
    Vermeulen H; Ubbink DT; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1270-7. PubMed ID: 17584345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretation and use of statistics in nursing research.
    Giuliano KK; Polanowicz M
    AACN Adv Crit Care; 2008; 19(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 18560290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The research evidence published in high impact nursing journals between 2000 and 2006: a quantitative content analysis.
    Mantzoukas S
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Apr; 46(4):479-89. PubMed ID: 19187934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) in practice: agreement between observers rating esophageal varices: how to cope with chance?
    Sierra F; Cárdenas A
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Nov; 102(11):2363-6. PubMed ID: 17958753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ambiguities and conflicting results: the limitations of the kappa statistic in establishing the interrater reliability of the Irish nursing minimum data set for mental health: a discussion paper.
    Morris R; MacNeela P; Scott A; Treacy P; Hyde A; O'Brien J; Lehwaldt D; Byrne A; Drennan J
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Apr; 45(4):645-7. PubMed ID: 17959177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assessment of ordinal scale reproducibility: log-linear models provided useful information on scale structure.
    Valet F; Guinot C; Ezzedine K; Mary JY
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):983-90. PubMed ID: 18502608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of the concordance correlation coefficient when examining agreement in dyadic research.
    Quinn C; Haber MJ; Pan Y
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 19752677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the clinical age-related maculopathy staging system.
    Seddon JM; Sharma S; Adelman RA
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):260-6. PubMed ID: 16458093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissemination of research in clinical nursing journals.
    Oermann MH; Nordstrom CK; Wilmes NA; Denison D; Webb SA; Featherston DE; Bednarz H; Striz P; Blair DA; Kowalewski K
    J Clin Nurs; 2008 Jan; 17(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18171391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Information sources for developing the nursing literature.
    Oermann MH; Nordstrom CK; Wilmes NA; Denison D; Webb SA; Featherston DE; Bednarz H; Striz P
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Apr; 45(4):580-7. PubMed ID: 17145059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Association or agreement between clinical measurement methods?].
    Engelmann MD
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Aug; 162(33):4400-1. PubMed ID: 10962965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of the assessment of preventable adverse drug events in daily clinical practice.
    van Doormaal JE; Mol PG; van den Bemt PM; Zaal RJ; Egberts AC; Kosterink JG; Haaijer-Ruskamp FM
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Jul; 17(7):645-54. PubMed ID: 18338767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The comparison of clinical imaging devices with respect to parallel readings in both devices.
    Krummenauer F
    Eur J Med Res; 2006 Mar; 11(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 16751112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of computerized emergency triage.
    Dong SL; Bullard MJ; Meurer DP; Blitz S; Ohinmaa A; Holroyd BR; Rowe BH
    Acad Emerg Med; 2006 Mar; 13(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 16495428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Level of agreement between patient self-report and observer ratings of health-related quality of life communication in oncology.
    Hilarius DL; Kloeg PH; Detmar SB; Muller MJ; Aaronson NK
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Jan; 65(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 16872790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and agreement of urodynamics interpretations in a female pelvic medicine center.
    Whiteside JL; Hijaz A; Imrey PB; Barber MD; Paraiso MF; Rackley RR; Vasavada SP; Walters MD; Daneshgari F
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 108(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 16880301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Analyzing interrater agreement for categorical data using Cohen's kappa and alternative coefficients].
    Wirtz M; Kutschmann M
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2007 Dec; 46(6):370-7. PubMed ID: 18188809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Misuses of correlation and regression analyses in orthodontic research: the problem of mathematical coupling.
    Tu YK; Nelson-Moon ZL; Gilthorpe MS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jul; 130(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 16849074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.