These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16325362)

  • 1. Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications.
    Dror IE; Charlton D; Péron AE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jan; 156(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 16325362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts.
    Dror I; Rosenthal R
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):900-3. PubMed ID: 18489557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Will the introduction of an emotional context affect fingerprint analysis and decision-making?
    Hall LJ; Player E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Oct; 181(1-3):36-9. PubMed ID: 18849126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing for potential contextual bias effects during the verification stage of the ACE-V methodology when conducting fingerprint comparisons.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Wertheim P
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):571-82. PubMed ID: 19432737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of human-technology cooperation and distributed cognition in forensic science: biasing effects of AFIS contextual information on human experts.
    Dror IE; Wertheim K; Fraser-Mackenzie P; Walajtys J
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 22212067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: inter- and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a 'target' comparison.
    Dror IE; Champod C; Langenburg G; Charlton D; Hunt H; Rosenthal R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):10-7. PubMed ID: 21129867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informing the judgments of fingerprint analysts using quality metric and statistical assessment tools.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Genessay T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):183-98. PubMed ID: 22269131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments.
    Fraser-Mackenzie PA; Dror IE; Wertheim K
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 23601721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expertise in fingerprint identification.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1519-30. PubMed ID: 23786258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrepancies in expert decision-making in forensic fingerprint examination.
    Mustonen V; Hakkarainen K; Tuunainen J; Pohjola P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():215-26. PubMed ID: 26254629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the preliminary psychophysics of fingerprint identification.
    Vokey JR; Tangen JM; Cole SA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):1023-40. PubMed ID: 19034812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23876092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concerning L.J. Hall, E. Player, "Will the introduction of an emotional context affect fingerprint analysis and decision-making?" [Forensic Sci. Int. 181 (2008) 36-39].
    Saks MJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Oct; 191(1-3):e19; author reply e21. PubMed ID: 19616906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cognitive science and the law.
    Busey TA; Loftus GR
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 11(3):111-7. PubMed ID: 17270486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The nature of expertise in fingerprint matching: experts can do a lot with a little.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114759. PubMed ID: 25517509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterizing missed identifications and errors in latent fingerprint comparisons using eye-tracking data.
    Busey TA; Heise N; Hicklin RA; Ulery BT; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251674. PubMed ID: 34029319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Collective intelligence in fingerprint analysis.
    Tangen JM; Kent KM; Searston RA
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):23. PubMed ID: 32430615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment.
    Pronin E
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Jan; 11(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17129749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple confidence estimates as indices of eyewitness memory.
    Sauer JD; Brewer N; Weber N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):528-47. PubMed ID: 18729714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surprise, memory, and retrospective judgment making: testing cognitive reconstruction theories of the hindsight bias effect.
    Ash IK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):916-33. PubMed ID: 19586261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.