These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16325362)
21. The impact of proficiency testing information and error aversions on the weight given to fingerprint evidence. Mitchell G; Garrett BL Behav Sci Law; 2019 Mar; 37(2):195-210. PubMed ID: 30883891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The potential (negative) influence of observational biases at the analysis stage of fingermark individualisation. Schiffer B; Champod C Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):116-20. PubMed ID: 16876354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A biased opinion: Demonstration of cognitive bias on a fingerprint matching task through knowledge of DNA test results. Stevenage SV; Bennett A Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jul; 276():93-106. PubMed ID: 28514701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Vulnerabilities of fingerprint reader to fake fingerprints attacks. Espinoza M; Champod C; Margot P Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jan; 204(1-3):41-9. PubMed ID: 21216360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Changes in latent fingerprint examiners' markup between analysis and comparison. Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Feb; 247():54-61. PubMed ID: 25553355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Do heart failure specialist nurses think differently when faced with 'hard' or 'easy' decisions: a judgement analysis. Thompson C; Spilsbury K; Dowding D; Pattenden J; Brownlow R J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2174-84. PubMed ID: 18705737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fingermark submission decision-making within a UK fingerprint laboratory: Do experts get the marks that they need? Earwaker H; Morgan RM; Harris AJ; Hall LJ Sci Justice; 2015 Jul; 55(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 26087871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Investigating investigators: examining witnesses' influence on investigators. Dahl LC; Lindsay DS; Brimacombe CA Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):707-32. PubMed ID: 16741634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Putting bias into context: The role of familiarity in identification. Searston RA; Tangen JM; Eva KW Law Hum Behav; 2016 Feb; 40(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 26301709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Enhancing the quality of aged latent fingerprints developed by superglue fuming: loss and replenishment of initiator. Wargacki SP; Lewis LA; Dadmun MD J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1138-44. PubMed ID: 18643866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical judgement and decision-making in nursing - nine modes of practice in a revised cognitive continuum. Standing M J Adv Nurs; 2008 Apr; 62(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 18352971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Enhancing security of fingerprints through contextual biometric watermarking. Noore A; Singh R; Vatsa M; Houck MM Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jul; 169(2-3):188-94. PubMed ID: 17018250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Value-induced bias in medical decision making. Levy AG; Hershey JC Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(2):269-76. PubMed ID: 18349431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Utilizing AFIS searching tools to reduce errors in fingerprint casework. Langenburg G; Hall C; Rosemarie Q Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():123-133. PubMed ID: 26295930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation. Dror IE; Hampikian G Sci Justice; 2011 Dec; 51(4):204-8. PubMed ID: 22137054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Fillers can help control for contextual bias in forensic comparison tasks. Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):295-305. PubMed ID: 30035551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biological foundations for forensic identifications based on fingerprints. Dankmeijer J; Waltman JM; de Wilde AG Acta Morphol Neerl Scand; 1980 Mar; 18(1):67-83. PubMed ID: 7395553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]