These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16325846)

  • 1. Conditions under which children experience inhibitory difficulty with a "button-press" go/no-go task.
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 May; 94(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 16325846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brief report: manipulation of task difficulty in inhibitory control tasks.
    Lindqvist S; Thorell LB
    Child Neuropsychol; 2009 Jan; 15(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 18608218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Under what conditions do young children have difficulty inhibiting manual actions?
    Simpson A; Riggs KJ
    Dev Psychol; 2007 Mar; 43(2):417-28. PubMed ID: 17352549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Apr; 166(2-3):223-37. PubMed ID: 19286266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Go or no-go? Developmental improvements in the efficiency of response inhibition in mid-childhood.
    Cragg L; Nation K
    Dev Sci; 2008 Nov; 11(6):819-27. PubMed ID: 19046150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Behavioural and ERP indices of response inhibition during a Stop-signal task in children with two subtypes of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Oct; 66(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 17604142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting cognitive control from preschool to late adolescence and young adulthood.
    Eigsti IM; Zayas V; Mischel W; Shoda Y; Ayduk O; Dadlani MB; Davidson MC; Lawrence Aber J; Casey BJ
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Jun; 17(6):478-84. PubMed ID: 16771797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two types of action error: electrophysiological evidence for separable inhibitory and sustained attention neural mechanisms producing error on go/no-go tasks.
    O'Connell RG; Dockree PM; Bellgrove MA; Turin A; Ward S; Foxe JJ; Robertson IH
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 18476764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.
    Verbruggen F; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1381-8. PubMed ID: 19686032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conditions under which young children can hold two rules in mind and inhibit a prepotent response.
    Diamond A; Kirkham N; Amso D
    Dev Psychol; 2002 May; 38(3):352-62. PubMed ID: 12005379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Activation of right inferior frontal gyrus during response inhibition across response modalities.
    Chikazoe J; Konishi S; Asari T; Jimura K; Miyashita Y
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 17214564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The nature of residual cost in regular switch response factors.
    Milán EG; González A; Sanabria D; Pereda A; Hochel M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 May; 122(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 16310155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The time course of social-emotional processing in early childhood: ERP responses to facial affect and personal familiarity in a Go-Nogo task.
    Todd RM; Lewis MD; Meusel LA; Zelazo PD
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):595-613. PubMed ID: 18061633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional dissociation in right inferior frontal cortex during performance of go/no-go task.
    Chikazoe J; Jimura K; Asari T; Yamashita K; Morimoto H; Hirose S; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jan; 19(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 18445602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing emotional facial expressions influences performance on a Go/NoGo task in pediatric anxiety and depression.
    Ladouceur CD; Dahl RE; Williamson DE; Birmaher B; Axelson DA; Ryan ND; Casey BJ
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2006 Nov; 47(11):1107-15. PubMed ID: 17076749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ability to activate and inhibit speeded responses: separate developmental trends.
    Band GP; van der Molen MW; Overtoom CC; Verbaten MN
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2000 Apr; 75(4):263-90. PubMed ID: 10698613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fast responders have blinders on: ERP correlates of response inhibition in competition.
    de Bruijn ER; Miedl SF; Bekkering H
    Cortex; 2008 May; 44(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 18387590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Arousal-state modulation in children with AD/HD.
    Benikos N; Johnstone SJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jan; 120(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 19027356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.
    Philipp AM; Jolicoeur P; Falkenstein M; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17983313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.