These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16326284)

  • 1. General considerations for cervical arthroplasty with technique for ProDisc-C.
    Chi JH; Ames CP; Tay B
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):609-19, vi. PubMed ID: 16326284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical disc arthroplasty: general introduction.
    Acosta FL; Ames CP
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):603-7, vi. PubMed ID: 16326283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging clarity of the Bryan, Prodisc-C, Prestige LP, and PCM cervical arthroplasty devices.
    Sekhon LH; Duggal N; Lynch JJ; Haid RW; Heller JG; Riew KD; Seex K; Anderson PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 17413473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical spine arthroplasty biomechanics.
    Puttlitz CM; DiAngelo DJ
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):589-94, v. PubMed ID: 16326281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relaxation of forces needed to distract cervical vertebrae after discectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Aryan HE; Newman CB; Lu DC; Hu SS; Tay BK; Bradford DS; Puttlitz CM; Ames CP
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):100-4. PubMed ID: 19342931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [ProDisc-C mobile replacement of an intervertebral disc. A prospective mono-centric two-year study].
    Stulík J; Kryl J; Sebesta P; Vyskocil T; Krbec M; Trc T
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Aug; 75(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 18760080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Prestige cervical disc.
    Traynelis VC
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):621-8, vi. PubMed ID: 16326285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Functional evaluation of the cervical spine after Bryan artificial disc replacement].
    Tian W; Liu B; Li Q; Hu L; Li ZY; Yuan Q; Han X
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):338-41. PubMed ID: 18785527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical and radiographic results of cervical artificial disc arthroplasty: over three years follow-up cohort study.
    Tian W; Han X; Liu B; Li Q; Hu L; Li ZY; Yuan Q; He D; Xing YG
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2010 Nov; 123(21):2969-73. PubMed ID: 21162939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial.
    Sasso RC; Best NM; Metcalf NH; Anderson PA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 18679092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re: Sasso R, Heller J, Hacker B, Smucker J. Artificial disc versus fusion. A prospective, randomized study with 2-years follow-up on 99 patients. Spine 2007;32:2933-40.
    Botelho RV
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(10):1156-7; author reply 1157. PubMed ID: 18449052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis.
    Anderson PA; Sasso RC; Riew KD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(12):1305-12. PubMed ID: 18496341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
    Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
    Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Clinical outcomes of single level Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective controlled study].
    Wang Y; Cai B; Zhang XS; Xiao SH; Wang Z; Lu N; Chai W; Zheng GQ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 18785525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Kershaw T; Shah RV; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Nanieva R; Karg A; Husted DS; Emerson JW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):992-7. PubMed ID: 16641775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Charité Artificial Disc: insertion technique.
    Aryan HE; Acosta FL; Ames CP
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):637-50, vii. PubMed ID: 16326287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Arthroplasty of the cervical disks using artificial prodisc C(tm) in 54 patients with 2-year follow-up].
    Sukhomel P; Byval'tsev VA
    Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2008; (3):20-4; discussion 25. PubMed ID: 19062591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The ProDisc artificial disc: insertion technique.
    Aryan HE; Acosta FL; Ames CP
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):651-6, vii. PubMed ID: 16326288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ProDisc-L total disc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Hannibal M; Thomas DJ; Low J; Hsu KY; Zucherman J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(21):2322-6. PubMed ID: 17906573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.