These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16326290)

  • 1. Emerging directions in motion preservation spinal surgery.
    Acosta FL; Aryan HE; Ames CP
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):665-9, vii. PubMed ID: 16326290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanics of lumbar arthroplasty.
    Crawford NR
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):595-602, v. PubMed ID: 16326282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Beastall J; Karadimas E; Siddiqui M; Nicol M; Hughes J; Smith F; Wardlaw D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 17413475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A biomechanical evaluation of graded posterior element removal for treatment of lumbar stenosis: comparison of a minimally invasive approach with two standard laminectomy techniques.
    Bresnahan L; Ogden AT; Natarajan RN; Fessler RG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 19127157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison between lumbar disc arthroplasty and fusion.
    Chen SH; Zhong ZC; Chen CS; Chen WJ; Hung C
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Mar; 31(2):244-53. PubMed ID: 18760654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System: 3-dimensional kinematics.
    Zhu Q; Larson CR; Sjovold SG; Rosler DM; Keynan O; Wilson DR; Cripton PA; Oxland TR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 17202893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Vertebral arthroplasty: a new approach to spinal surgery].
    Otten P; Wachtl SW
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2001 Aug; 121(8):607-10. PubMed ID: 11565226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical spine arthroplasty biomechanics.
    Puttlitz CM; DiAngelo DJ
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):589-94, v. PubMed ID: 16326281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally invasive dynamic stabilization of the degenerated lumbar spine.
    Bonaldi G
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2010 May; 20(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 20439019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc.
    Denozière G; Ku DN
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(4):766-75. PubMed ID: 16439247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-segment fusion of the thoracolumbar spine in conjunction with a motion-preserving artificial disc replacement: case report and review of the literature.
    Lehman RA; Lenke LG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):E240-5. PubMed ID: 17414900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanics of the posterior lumbar articulating elements.
    Serhan HA; Varnavas G; Dooris AP; Patwadhan A; Tzermiadianos M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2007 Jan; 22(1):E1. PubMed ID: 17608330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
    Rousseau MA; Bradford DS; Bertagnoli R; Hu SS; Lotz JC
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incidence of contraindications to total disc arthroplasty: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive fusion patients with a specific analysis of facet arthrosis.
    Wong DA; Annesser B; Birney T; Lamond R; Kumar A; Johnson S; Jatana S; Ghiselli G
    Spine J; 2007; 7(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 17197326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Charité Artificial Disc: insertion technique.
    Aryan HE; Acosta FL; Ames CP
    Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):637-50, vii. PubMed ID: 16326287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Maiman DJ; Pintar FA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18525492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
    Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.