BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16326298)

  • 1. Effectiveness and safety of internal rectilinear biphasic versus monophasic defibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
    Winterhalter M; Piepenbrock T; Leyh RG; Gras C; Zuk J; Heine J; Hagl C; Rahe-Meyer N; Hecker H; Piepenbrock S
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2005 Dec; 19(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 16326298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Transthoracic cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison of three different waveforms].
    Santomauro M; Borrelli A; Ottaviano L; Costanzo A; Monteforte N; Duilio C; Chiariello M
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2004 Jan; 5(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 15253143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of myocardial injury after internal cardioversion for atrial fibrillation.
    Gorenek B; Kudaiberdieva G; Goktekin O; Cavusoglu Y; Birdane A; Ata N; Unalir A; Timuralp B
    Can J Cardiol; 2004 Feb; 20(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 15010739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of neurological outcomes following witnessed out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation defibrillated with either biphasic or monophasic automated external defibrillators.
    Kajino K; Iwami T; Berg RA; Hiraide A; Hayashi Y; Yukioka H; Tanaka H; Shimazu T; Sugimoto H
    Emerg Med J; 2009 Jul; 26(7):492-6. PubMed ID: 19546269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks.
    Ricard P; Lévy S; Boccara G; Lakhal E; Bardy G
    Europace; 2001 Apr; 3(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 11333061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BIPHASIC Trial: a randomized comparison of fixed lower versus escalating higher energy levels for defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
    Stiell IG; Walker RG; Nesbitt LP; Chapman FW; Cousineau D; Christenson J; Bradford P; Sookram S; Berringer R; Lank P; Wells GA
    Circulation; 2007 Mar; 115(12):1511-7. PubMed ID: 17353443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized controlled trial of efficacy and ST change following use of the Welch-Allyn MRL PIC biphasic waveform versus damped sine monophasic waveform for external DC cardioversion.
    Ambler JJ; Deakin CD
    Resuscitation; 2006 Nov; 71(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 16987583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest rectilinear biphasic to monophasic damped sine defibrillation waveforms with advanced life support intervention trial (ORBIT).
    Morrison LJ; Dorian P; Long J; Vermeulen M; Schwartz B; Sawadsky B; Frank J; Cameron B; Burgess R; Shield J; Bagley P; Mausz V; Brewer JE; Lerman BB;
    Resuscitation; 2005 Aug; 66(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 15992986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pediatric defibrillation doses often fail to terminate prolonged out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in children.
    Berg MD; Samson RA; Meyer RJ; Clark LL; Valenzuela TD; Berg RA
    Resuscitation; 2005 Oct; 67(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 16199288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biphasic versus monophasic shock for external cardioversion of atrial flutter: a prospective, randomized trial.
    Mortensen K; Risius T; Schwemer TF; Aydin MA; Köster R; Klemm HU; Lutomsky B; Meinertz T; Ventura R; Willems S
    Cardiology; 2008; 111(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 18239394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transthoracic incremental monophasic versus biphasic defibrillation by emergency responders (TIMBER): a randomized comparison of monophasic with biphasic waveform ascending energy defibrillation for the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation.
    Kudenchuk PJ; Cobb LA; Copass MK; Olsufka M; Maynard C; Nichol G
    Circulation; 2006 Nov; 114(19):2010-8. PubMed ID: 17060379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Post-shock myocardial stunning: a prospective randomised double-blind comparison of monophasic and biphasic waveforms.
    Deakin CD; Ambler JJ
    Resuscitation; 2006 Mar; 68(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 16378672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cardiac biochemical markers after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.
    Vikenes K; Omvik P; Farstad M; Nordrehaug JE
    Am Heart J; 2000 Oct; 140(4):690-6. PubMed ID: 11011347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Better outcome after pediatric defibrillation dosage than adult dosage in a swine model of pediatric ventricular fibrillation.
    Berg RA; Samson RA; Berg MD; Chapman FW; Hilwig RW; Banville I; Walker RG; Nova RC; Anavy N; Kern KB
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Mar; 45(5):786-9. PubMed ID: 15734626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical open-chest ventricular defibrillation: triphasic waveforms are superior to biphasic waveforms.
    Zhang Y; Boddicker KA; Davies LR; Jones JL; Kerber RE
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 27(7):941-8. PubMed ID: 15271014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Efficacy and safety of ambulatory electric cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with monophasic and biphasic shock].
    Neri G; Alitto F; Zamprogno R; Biondi P; Stefanini MG; Pizzolato F; Buchberger R
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2001 Dec; 2(12):1315-8. PubMed ID: 11838354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of efficacy of pulsed biphasic waveform and rectilinear biphasic waveform in a short ventricular fibrillation pig model.
    Li Y; Wang H; Cho JH; Didon JP; Bisera J; Weil MH; Tang W
    Resuscitation; 2009 Sep; 80(9):1047-51. PubMed ID: 19604618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: advantages of the transthoracic biphasic method].
    Carunchio A; Burattini M; Coletta C; Pandolfo L; Porzio A; Zecchini F; Ceci V
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2002 Jun; 3(6):638-45. PubMed ID: 12116814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator systems: a randomized comparison of monophasic and biphasic shock energy application.
    Manegold JC; Israel CW; Ehrlich JR; Duray G; Pajitnev D; Wegener FT; Hohnloser SH
    Eur Heart J; 2007 Jul; 28(14):1731-8. PubMed ID: 17569681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Serum troponin I and myoglobin after monophasic versus biphasic transthoracic shocks for cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Kosior DA; Opolski G; Tadeusiak W; Chwyczko T; Wozakowska-Kaplon B; Stawicki S; Filipak KJ; Rabczenko D
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jan; 28 Suppl 1():S128-32. PubMed ID: 15683479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.