These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16326878)

  • 1. Validity of an oblique posterior condylar radiographic view for revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Miura H; Matsuda S; Okazaki K; Kawano T; Kawamura H; Iwamoto Y
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Dec; 87(12):1643-6. PubMed ID: 16326878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The oblique posterior femoral condylar radiographic view following total knee arthroplasty.
    Miura H; Matsuda S; Mawatari T; Kawano T; Nabeyama R; Iwamoto Y
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Jan; 86(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 14711944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of offset stem couplers in femoral revision knee arthroplasty: a radiographic study.
    Brilhault JM; Ries MD
    Knee; 2012 Mar; 19(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 21497096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Full-thickness cartilage-based posterior femoral condylar offset. Influence on knee flexion after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
    Yang G; Chen W; Chen W; Sun X; Zhou D; Chen S; Zhang L
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 102(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 27108259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonconstrained implants in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Takahashi Y; Gustilo RB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Dec; (309):156-62. PubMed ID: 7994955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in posterior condylar offset after total knee arthroplasty cannot be determined by radiographic measurements alone.
    Clarke HD
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1155-8. PubMed ID: 22342129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of a modular rotating hinge component in salvage revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Barrack RL; Lyons TR; Ingraham RQ; Johnson JC
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Oct; 15(7):858-66. PubMed ID: 11061445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medium-term results with the Press Fit Condylar (PFC) Sigma knee prosthesis the Wrightington experience.
    Zaki SH; Rafiq I; Kapoor A; Raut V; Gambhir AK; Porter ML
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2007 Feb; 73(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 17441659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The posterior condylar offset ratio and femoral anatomy in anterior versus posterior referencing total knee arthroplasty.
    Almeida PH; Vilaça A
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Oct; 101(6):687-91. PubMed ID: 26205566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Underestimation of osteolysis in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
    Nadaud MC; Fehring TK; Fehring K
    J Arthroplasty; 2004 Jan; 19(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 14716658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio.
    Johal P; Hassaballa MA; Eldridge JD; Porteous AJ
    Knee; 2012 Dec; 19(6):843-5. PubMed ID: 22682692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pre-operative radiological measurement of femoral rotation for prosthetic positioning in total knee arthroplasty.
    Savin L; Botez P; Mihailescu D; Predescu V; Grierosu C
    Int Orthop; 2016 Sep; 40(9):1855-60. PubMed ID: 26803321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patellofemoral evaluation after total knee arthroplasty. Validation of a new weight-bearing axial radiographic view.
    Baldini A; Anderson JA; Cerulli-Mariani P; Kalyvas J; Pavlov H; Sculco TP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Aug; 89(8):1810-7. PubMed ID: 17671022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modular fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament. A study of patients followed for a minimum of fifteen years.
    Dixon MC; Brown RR; Parsch D; Scott RD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Mar; 87(3):598-603. PubMed ID: 15741628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The early radiological follow-up of a medial rotational design of total knee arthroplasty.
    Amin A; Al-Taiar A; Sanghrajka AP; Kang N; Scott G
    Knee; 2008 Jun; 15(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 18280168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Revision knee arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening].
    Rozkydal Z; Janík P; Janícek P; Kunovský R
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17331449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modular insert exchange in knee arthroplasty for treatment of wear and osteolysis.
    Griffin WL; Scott RD; Dalury DF; Mahoney OM; Chiavetta JB; Odum SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Nov; 464():132-7. PubMed ID: 18062046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of radiolucent lines around the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: sensitivity and specificity for loosening.
    Kalra S; Smith TO; Berko B; Walton NP
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jun; 93(6):777-81. PubMed ID: 21586776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Partington PF; Sawhney J; Rorabeck CH; Barrack RL; Moore J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Oct; (367):165-71. PubMed ID: 10546611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The results of revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Goldberg VM; Figgie MP; Figgie HE; Sobel M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Jan; (226):86-92. PubMed ID: 3335110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.