These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1632743)

  • 1. Computed tomography of the abdomen with fat density oral contrast medium.
    Malik N; Khandelwal N; Garg K; Suri S
    Australas Radiol; 1992 Feb; 36(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 1632743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fat-density oral contrast agent for abdominal CT.
    Raptopoulos V; Davis MA; Davidoff A; Karellas A; Hays D; D'Orsi CJ; Smith EH
    Radiology; 1987 Sep; 164(3):653-6. PubMed ID: 3615862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT of the pancreas with a fat-density oral contrast regimen.
    Raptopoulos V; Davidoff A; Karellas A; Davis MA; Coolbaugh BL; Smith EH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1988 Jun; 150(6):1303-6. PubMed ID: 3259368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of dilute Calogen as a fat density oral contrast medium in upper abdominal computed tomography, compared with the use of water and positive oral contrast media.
    Ramsay DW; Markham DH; Morgan B; Rodgers PM; Liddicoat AJ
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Aug; 56(8):670-3. PubMed ID: 11467870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Imaging of the bowel wall. Computed tomography and fat density oral-contrast agent in an animal model.
    Raptopoulos V; Davis MA; Smith EH
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Nov; 21(11):847-50. PubMed ID: 3781789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Non-absorbable fat-dense oral contrast agent for abdominal computed tomography.
    Zwaan M; Gmelin E; Borgis KJ; Rinast E
    Eur J Radiol; 1992; 14(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 1563426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of 2 positive and 1 negative oral contrast media for abdominal CT diagnosis].
    Zwaan M; Gmelin E
    Rontgenblatter; 1989 May; 42(5):219-23. PubMed ID: 2756307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of oral contrast agents for abdominal magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kraus BB; Rappaport DC; Ros PR; Torres GM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1994; 12(6):847-58. PubMed ID: 7968284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Positive and negative oral contrast agents for combined abdominal and pelvic helical CT: first iodinated agent and second water.
    Matsuoka Y; Masumoto T; Koga H; Suzuki K; Ushimi T; Terada H; Tamura A; Yokoyama Y; Abe K; Kamata N
    Radiat Med; 2000; 18(3):213-6. PubMed ID: 10972554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography.
    Hebert JJ; Taylor AJ; Winter TC; Reichelderfer M; Weichert JP
    Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 16252139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of iohexol as oral contrast for computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis.
    Horton KM; Fishman EK; Gayler B
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(2):207-9. PubMed ID: 18379303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The initial experience of the upper abdominal CT angiography using low-concentration contrast medium on dual energy spectral CT.
    Xin L; Yang X; Huang N; Du X; Zhang J; Wang Y; Hou L; Gao J
    Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(7):2894-9. PubMed ID: 26036793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
    Low RN; Francis IR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography in children: the effects on gastric fluid volume.
    Mahmoud M; McAuliffe J; Kim HY; Mishra P; Salisbury S; Schnell B; Hirsch P; Arbabi S; Donnelly LF
    Anesth Analg; 2010 Nov; 111(5):1252-8. PubMed ID: 20736428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A new contrast medium for bowel opacification in abdominal CT scans--with comparative studies on water-soluble iodinated contrast and on fat emulsion].
    Sako M; Hasegawa M; Watanabe H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Jan; 44(1):93-5. PubMed ID: 6739282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of abdominal computed tomography angiography: hand versus mechanical intravenous contrast administration in children.
    Ayyala RS; Zurakowski D; Lee EY
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Nov; 45(12):1781-7. PubMed ID: 26150079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Upper gastrointestinal tract and abdomen: water as an orally administered contrast agent for helical CT.
    Winter TC; Ager JD; Nghiem HV; Hill RS; Harrison SD; Freeny PC
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):365-70. PubMed ID: 8888224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical note: low density contrast in upper abdominal computed tomography.
    Walker D; Blaquiere RM
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Jan; 68(805):80-1. PubMed ID: 7881888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dual-energy CT angiography of abdomen with routine concentration contrast agent in comparison with conventional single-energy CT with high concentration contrast agent.
    He J; Wang Q; Ma X; Sun Z
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Feb; 84(2):221-7. PubMed ID: 25487820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abdominal helical CT: milk as a low-attenuation oral contrast agent.
    Thompson SE; Raptopoulos V; Sheiman RL; McNicholas MM; Prassopoulos P
    Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):870-5. PubMed ID: 10352618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.