128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16327545)
21. Functional outcomes of soft palate free flap reconstruction following oropharyngeal cancer surgery.
Melan JB; Philouze P; Pradat P; Benzerdjeb N; Blanc J; Ceruse P; Fuchsmann C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 47(9):2265-2271. PubMed ID: 33994058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Speech outcomes after soft palate reconstruction with the soft palate insufficiency repair procedure.
Rieger JM; Zalmanowitz JG; Li SY; Tang JL; Williams D; Harris J; Seikaly H
Head Neck; 2008 Nov; 30(11):1439-44. PubMed ID: 18720520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Nasopharyngoscopy in palatopharyngeal prosthetic rehabilitation: A preliminary report.
Rieger JM; Zalmanowitz JG; Wolfaardt JF
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 16900822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Changes in articulatory proficiency following microvascular reconstruction in oral or oropharyngeal cancer.
Markkanen-Leppänen M; Isotalo E; Mäkitie AA; Asko-Seljavaara S; Pessi T; Suominen E; Haapanen ML
Oral Oncol; 2006 Jul; 42(6):646-52. PubMed ID: 16488177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Positive narrowing pharyngoplasty with forearm flap for functional restoration after extensive soft palate resection.
Hashikawa K; Tahara S; Terashi H; Ichinose A; Nomura T; Omori M; Sanno T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Feb; 115(2):388-93. PubMed ID: 15692341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The correlation between nasalance and a differentiated perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency.
Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; van Wijngaarden HA; Dejonckere PH
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 12019003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radial forearm-palmaris longus tenocutaneous free flap; implication in the repair of the moderate-sized postoncologic soft palate defect.
Roh TS; Lee WJ; Choi EC; Koh YW; Lew DH
Head Neck; 2009 Sep; 31(9):1220-7. PubMed ID: 19360739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Functional results of primary closure vs flaps in oropharyngeal reconstruction: a prospective study of speech and swallowing.
McConnel FM; Pauloski BR; Logemann JA; Rademaker AW; Colangelo L; Shedd D; Carroll W; Lewin J; Johnson J
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 Jun; 124(6):625-30. PubMed ID: 9639470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Social perception of speech in individuals with oropharyngeal reconstruction.
Rieger J; Dickson N; Lemire R; Bloom K; Wolfaardt J; Wolfaardt U; Seikaly H
J Psychosoc Oncol; 2006; 24(4):33-51. PubMed ID: 17182476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Hypertrophied tonsils impair velopharyngeal function after palatoplasty.
Abdel-Aziz M
Laryngoscope; 2012 Mar; 122(3):528-32. PubMed ID: 22252734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Acoustic parameters of speech: Lack of correlation with perceptual and questionnaire-based speech evaluation in patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer treated with primary surgery.
Dwivedi RC; St Rose S; Chisholm EJ; Clarke PM; Kerawala CJ; Nutting CM; Rhys-Evans PH; Kazi R; Harrington KJ
Head Neck; 2016 May; 38(5):670-6. PubMed ID: 25524696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Velopharyngeal function after two different types of pharyngoplasty.
Ysunza A; Pamplona MC
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):1031-7. PubMed ID: 16309748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cerclage sphincter pharyngoplasty: a new technique for velopharyngeal insufficiency.
Ragab A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 May; 71(5):793-800. PubMed ID: 17343926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Surgical reconstruction versus prosthetic obturation of extensive soft palate defects: a comparison of speech outcomes.
Rieger J; Bohle Iii G; Huryn J; Tang JL; Harris J; Seikaly H
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):566-72. PubMed ID: 19918590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [The management of velopharyngeal insufficiency after pharyngeal augmentations and furlow surgery].
Wójcicki P; Wójcicka G
Otolaryngol Pol; 2006; 60(6):887-92. PubMed ID: 17357668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Functional results and survival probability of tumor patients after reconstruction of the mouth cavity and oropharynx using a microvascular radial forearm flap].
Bootz F; Becker D; Fliesek J
HNO; 1993 Aug; 41(8):380-4. PubMed ID: 8407379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effects of Le Fort I osteotomies on velopharyngeal and speech functions in cleft patients.
Janulewicz J; Costello BJ; Buckley MJ; Ford MD; Close J; Gassner R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Mar; 62(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 15015163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Aerodynamic indices of velopharyngeal function in childhood apraxia of speech.
Sealey LR; Giddens CL
Clin Linguist Phon; 2010 Jun; 24(6):417-30. PubMed ID: 20136498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Speech outcome regarding overall intelligibility, articulation, resonance and voice in Flemish children a year after pharyngeal flap surgery. A pilot study.
Van Lierde KM; Bonte K; Baudonck N; Van Cauwenberge P; De Leenheer EM
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 18698142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of pharyngeal flap surgery on nasality and nasalance scores of nasal sounds production in individuals with cleft lip and palate.
Fukushiro AP; Ferlin F; Yamashita RP; Trindade IE
Codas; 2015; 27(6):584-7. PubMed ID: 26691623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
