128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16327545)
41. Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults.
Van Lierde KM; Wuyts FL; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Mar; 38(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 11294538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The self-lined superiorly based pull-through velopharyngoplasty: plastic surgery-speech pathology interaction in the management of velopharyngeal insufficiency.
Johns DF; Cannito MP; Rohrich RJ; Tebbetts JB
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Sep; 94(3):436-45. PubMed ID: 8047594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Objective acoustic-phonetic speech analysis in patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer.
de Bruijn MJ; ten Bosch L; Kuik DJ; Quené H; Langendijk JA; Leemans CR; Verdonck-de Leeuw IM
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(3):180-7. PubMed ID: 19571552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Velopharyngeal incompentance treated by the pharyngeal flap and the Orticochea pharyngoplasty--a comparison of speech results].
Wójcicki P; Swidziński P; Wójcicka G
Otolaryngol Pol; 2005; 59(5):705-12. PubMed ID: 16471188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of postoperative function in patients undergoing reconstruction following resection of superior and lateral oropharyngeal cancer: long-term outcomes of reconstruction with the Gehanno method.
Inoue T; Nagata M; Yukawa H; Ogura M; Fujisawa T; Miyamoto M; Suzuki K; Tomoda K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 41(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 22057121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Surgical variables affecting speech in treated patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer.
Pauloski BR; Logemann JA; Colangelo LA; Rademaker AW; McConnel FM; Heiser MA; Cardinale S; Shedd D; Stein D; Beery Q; Myers E; Lewin J; Haxer M; Esclamado R
Laryngoscope; 1998 Jun; 108(6):908-16. PubMed ID: 9628509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Observed effects of velopharyngeal orifice size on vowel identification and vowel nasality.
Watterson T; Emanuel F
Cleft Palate J; 1981 Oct; 18(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 6945158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Does contribution of extended vomer flap to palatoplasty affects speech results.
Calis M; Ekin O; Kayikci ME; Icen M; Suslu N; Ozgur F
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):1980-4. PubMed ID: 25377956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Salvaging the failed pharyngoplasty: intervention outcome.
Witt PD; Myckatyn T; Marsh JL
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1998 Sep; 35(5):447-53. PubMed ID: 9761566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Simplified Designing and Insetting of the Free Flap in Reconstructing Oral and/or Oropharyngeal Defect.
Yoon J; Yim JH; Kim EK
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):2004-7. PubMed ID: 26359704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The application of multilobed flap designs for anatomic and functional oropharyngeal reconstructions.
Choi JW; Lee MY; Oh TS
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 24(6):2091-7. PubMed ID: 24220414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of resonance outcomes after pharyngeal flap and furlow double-opposing z-plasty for surgical management of velopharyngeal incompetence.
Dailey SA; Karnell MP; Karnell LH; Canady JW
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2006 Jan; 43(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 16405372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Functional outcomes following palatal reconstruction with a folded radial forearm free flap.
Sinha UK; Young P; Hurvitz K; Crockett DM
Ear Nose Throat J; 2004 Jan; 83(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 14986758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Surgical outcome of pharyngeal flap surgery and intravelar veloplasty on the velopharyngeal function.
Barbosa DA; Scarmagnani RH; Fukushiro AP; Trindade IE; Yamashita RP
Codas; 2013; 25(5):451-5. PubMed ID: 24408549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Correlation between the perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency and composite measures derived from mean nasalance scores.
Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; Dejonckere PH
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2004; 56(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 15087571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Speech outcomes and velopharyngeal function after surgical treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in individuals with signs of velocardiofacial syndrome.
Brandão GR; de Souza Freitas JA; Genaro KF; Yamashita RP; Fukushiro AP; Lauris JR
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1736-42. PubMed ID: 21959422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Pharyngeal flap surgery in adults.
Hall CD; Golding-Kushner KJ; Argamaso RV; Strauch B
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1991 Apr; 28(2):179-82; discussion 182-3. PubMed ID: 2069974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Long-term follow-up after division of a pharyngeal flap for severe nasal obstruction.
Caouette-Laberge L; Egerszegi EP; de Remont AM; Ottenseyer I
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Jan; 29(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 1547248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Functional soft palate reconstruction: a comprehensive surgical approach.
Seikaly H; Rieger J; Zalmanowitz J; Tang JL; Alkahtani K; Ansari K; O'Connell D; Moysa G; Harris J
Head Neck; 2008 Dec; 30(12):1615-23. PubMed ID: 18798302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Speech outcomes of early palatal repair with or without intravelar veloplasty in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Doucet JC; Herlin C; Captier G; Baylon H; Verdeil M; Bigorre M
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):845-50. PubMed ID: 23742818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
