These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16328116)

  • 1. Prospective randomized comparison of transobturator suburethral sling (Monarc) vs suprapubic arc (Sparc) sling procedures for female urodynamic stress incontinence.
    Wang AC; Lin YH; Tseng LH; Chih SY; Lee CJ
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2006 Sep; 17(5):439-43. PubMed ID: 16328116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multi-centre, randomised clinical control trial comparing the retropubic (RP) approach versus the transobturator approach (TO) for tension-free, suburethral sling treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: the TORP study.
    Barry C; Lim YN; Muller R; Hitchins S; Corstiaans A; Foote A; Greenland H; Frazer M; Rane A
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2008 Feb; 19(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 17634853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of suprapubic versus transobturator surgical treatments of female stress urinary incontinence.
    Sun MJ; Chang NE; Chen GD; Tsai HD
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 47(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 18603502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomized comparison of the suprapubic arc sling procedure vs tension-free vaginal taping for stress incontinent women.
    Tseng LH; Wang AC; Lin YH; Li SJ; Ko YJ
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2005; 16(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 15875240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.
    Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; de Ridder DJ; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 25168619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective Study Comparing the Suprapubic Arc (Sparc) Procedure and the Transobturator (Monarc) Procedure for Treating Female Stress Urinary Incontinence.
    Shin JH; Lim JS; Song KH; Sul CK; Na YG
    Low Urin Tract Symptoms; 2010 Apr; 2(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 26676218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes following mid-urethral sling placement in patients with intrinsic sphincteric deficiency: comparison of Sparc and Monarc slings.
    Rapp DE; Govier FE; Kobashi KC
    Int Braz J Urol; 2009; 35(1):68-75; discussion 75. PubMed ID: 19254401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined pelvic reconstructive surgery and transobturator tape (monarc) in women with advanced prolapse and urodynamic stress incontinence: a case control series.
    Lo TS
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 19249703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Five-year follow-up study of Monarc transobturator tape for surgical treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence.
    Lo TS; Jaili S; Tan YL; Wu PY
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1653-1659. PubMed ID: 27085545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.
    Lemack GE; Krauss S; Litman H; FitzGerald MP; Chai T; Nager C; Sirls L; Zyczynski H; Baker J; Lloyd K; Steers WD;
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2076-80. PubMed ID: 18804239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Is initial success after Monarc(®) suburethral sling durable at mid-term evaluation?].
    Betari R; Meynier J; Forzini T; François T; Hakami F; Saint F
    Prog Urol; 2016 Jun; 26(7):409-14. PubMed ID: 27032312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasonography and clinical outcomes following surgical anti-incontinence procedures (Monarc vs Miniarc).
    Lo TS; Tan YL; Wu PY; Cortes EF; Pue LB; Al-Kharabsheh A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Nov; 182():91-7. PubMed ID: 25265496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized prospective study comparing Monarc and Miniarc suburethral slings.
    Foote A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Jan; 41(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 25363659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tension-free vaginal tape and autologous rectus fascia pubovaginal sling for the treatment of urinary stress incontinence: a medium-term follow-up.
    Sharifiaghdas F; Mortazavi N
    Med Princ Pract; 2008; 17(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 18408389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized trial of a single incision versus an outside-in transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 12 month results.
    Lee JK; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL; Lim YN; Muller R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 213(1):35.e1-35.e9. PubMed ID: 25637849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Analysis of the results of urinary incontinence treatment in women using free suburethral synthetic sling: the experience of 1000 operations].
    Kasian GR; Gvozdev MIu; Godunov BN; Prokopovich MA; Pushkar' DIu
    Urologiia; 2013; (4):5-11. PubMed ID: 24159756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detrusor overactivity and urge urinary incontinence following trans obturator versus midurethral slings.
    Botros SM; Miller JJ; Goldberg RP; Gandhi S; Akl M; Beaumont JL; Sand PK
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 17149712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complications from the placement of a tension-free suburethral sling using the transobturator and retropubic methods for treatment of female urinary incontinence.
    Arrabal-Polo MÁ; Palao-Yago F; Zuluaga-Gómez A; López-León VM; Merino-Salas S; Lahoz-García C; Arrabal-Martín M
    Urol Int; 2012; 89(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 22677644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suburethral slingplasty evaluation study in North Queensland, Australia: the SUSPEND trial.
    Lim YN; Muller R; Corstiaans A; Dietz HP; Barry C; Rane A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 45(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 15730366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study.
    Jurakova M; Huser M; Belkov I; Janku P; Hudecek R; Stourac P; Jarkovsky J; Ventruba P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2016 May; 27(5):791-6. PubMed ID: 26630947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.