261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16328130)
1. The circumferential resection margin in rectal carcinoma surgery.
Hermanek P; Junginger T
Tech Coloproctol; 2005 Dec; 9(3):193-9; discussion 199-200. PubMed ID: 16328130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Magnetic resonance imaging in rectal cancer downstaged using neoadjuvant chemoradiation: accuracy of prediction of tumour stage and circumferential resection margin status.
Kulkarni T; Gollins S; Maw A; Hobson P; Byrne R; Widdowson D
Colorectal Dis; 2008 Jun; 10(5):479-89. PubMed ID: 18318754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is the circumferential resection margin a predictor of local recurrence after preoperative radiotherapy and optimal surgery for rectal carcinoma?
Khani MH; Smedh K; Kraaz W
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Oct; 9(8):706-12. PubMed ID: 17535279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retroperitoneal margin involvement by adenocarcinoma of the caecum and ascending colon: what does it mean?
Scott N; Jamali A; Verbeke C; Ambrose NS; Botterill ID; Jayne DG
Colorectal Dis; 2008 Mar; 10(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 17764533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preoperative irradiation and surgery for local recurrence of rectal and rectosigmoid cancer. Prognostic factors with regard to survival and further local recurrence.
Wiig JN; Larsen SG; Dueland S; Giercksky KE
Colorectal Dis; 2008 Jan; 10(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18028472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rectal cancer: involved circumferential resection margin - a root cause analysis.
Youssef H; Collantes EC; Rashid SH; Wong LS; Baragwanath P
Colorectal Dis; 2009 Jun; 11(5):470-4. PubMed ID: 18637930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic value of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis in rectal cancer.
Martling A; Holm T; Bremmer S; Lindholm J; Cedermark B; Blomqvist L
Br J Surg; 2003 Nov; 90(11):1422-8. PubMed ID: 14598425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of pathological stage and circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer].
Jiang JB; Dai Y; Zhang XM; Li CF; Jin ZT; Bi DS; Sun JZ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 86(14):961-4. PubMed ID: 16759535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Prognostic analysis of middle and lower rectal cancer with different degrees of infiltration in mesorectum].
Zhuo HQ; Zhou YB; Lü L; Zhou J; Yang WY; Li YJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 89(12):820-2. PubMed ID: 19595121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of circumferential resection margin predicts disease-free survival and local recurrence: 5-year follow-up results of the MERCURY study.
Taylor FG; Quirke P; Heald RJ; Moran BJ; Blomqvist L; Swift IR; Sebag-Montefiore D; Tekkis P; Brown G;
J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 24276776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Circumferential margin involvement is the crucial prognostic factor after multimodality treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma.
Gosens MJ; Klaassen RA; Tan-Go I; Rutten HJ; Martijn H; van den Brule AJ; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; van Krieken JH; Nagtegaal ID
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Nov; 13(22 Pt 1):6617-23. PubMed ID: 18006762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer.
Boyle KM; Petty D; Chalmers AG; Quirke P; Cairns A; Finan PJ; Sagar PM; Burke D
Colorectal Dis; 2005 May; 7(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 15859960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of total mesorectal excision and of circumferential resection margin in local recurrence and survival of patients with rectal carcinoma.
Tzardi M
Dig Dis; 2007; 25(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 17384508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
Jeyarajah S; Sutton CD; Miller AS; Hemingway D;
Colorectal Dis; 2007 Nov; 9(9):808-15. PubMed ID: 17441969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical significance of the circumferential resection margin following preoperative pelvic chemo-radiotherapy in rectal cancer: why we need a common language.
Glynne-Jones R; Mawdsley S; Novell JR
Colorectal Dis; 2006 Nov; 8(9):800-7. PubMed ID: 17032329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Local staging of rectal carcinoma and assessment of the circumferential resection margin with high-resolution MRI using an integrated parallel acquisition technique.
Oberholzer K; Junginger T; Kreitner KF; Krummenauer F; Simiantonaki N; Trouet S; Thelen M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jul; 22(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 15971183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial.
den Dulk M; Marijnen CA; Putter H; Rutten HJ; Beets GL; Wiggers T; Nagtegaal ID; van de Velde CJ
Ann Surg; 2007 Jul; 246(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 17592295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One millimetre is the safe cut-off for magnetic resonance imaging prediction of surgical margin status in rectal cancer.
Taylor FG; Quirke P; Heald RJ; Moran B; Blomqvist L; Swift I; St Rose S; Sebag-Montefiore DJ; Tekkis P; Brown G;
Br J Surg; 2011 Jun; 98(6):872-9. PubMed ID: 21480194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative assessment of the circumferential margin in rectal cancer is more informative in treatment planning than the T stage.
Wolberink SV; Beets-Tan RG; Nagtegaal ID; Wiggers T
Tech Coloproctol; 2006 Oct; 10(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 16969621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer surgery.
Dardanov D; Betova T; Deliyski T
J BUON; 2007; 12(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 17918291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]