These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching. Druey MD; Hübner R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution. Schuch S; Koch I Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 20719288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies. Miller J Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):484-93. PubMed ID: 16237555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unmixing the mixing cost: contributions from dimensional relevance and stimulus-response suppression. Marí-Beffa P; Cooper S; Houghton G J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):478-88. PubMed ID: 22060145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences. Schneider DW; Logan GD J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):623-40. PubMed ID: 17087577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On the minimization of task switch costs following long-term training. Berryhill ME; Hughes HC Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):503-14. PubMed ID: 19304641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The preparation effect in task switching: carryover of SOA. Altmann EM Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):153-63. PubMed ID: 15078052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Task switching versus cue switching: using transition cuing to disentangle sequential effects in task-switching performance. Schneider DW; Logan GD J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):370-8. PubMed ID: 17352618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of preparation in overlapping-task performance. De Jong R Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Feb; 48(1):2-25. PubMed ID: 7754082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Current task activation predicts general effects of advance preparation in task switching. Poljac E; de Haan A; van Galen GP Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 17176657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Timing is affected by demands in memory search but not by task switching. Fortin C; Schweickert R; Gaudreault R; Viau-Quesnel C J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):580-95. PubMed ID: 20515190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]