330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16328641)
1. No-vertical-scar technique versus inverted T-scar technique in reduction mammoplasty: a two-center comparative study.
Hosnuter M; Tosun Z; Kargi E; Babuccu O; Savaci N
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2005; 29(6):496-502. PubMed ID: 16328641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective quantitative comparison of breast sensation after superior and inferior pedicle mammaplasty.
Hamdi M; Greuse M; De Mey A; Webster MH
Br J Plast Surg; 2001 Jan; 54(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 11121316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vertical scar versus the inverted-T scar reduction mammaplasty: a 10-year follow-up.
Bouwer LR; van der Biezen JJ; Spronk CA; van der Lei B
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Oct; 65(10):1298-304. PubMed ID: 22658727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Asplund-Davies vertical scar breast reduction technique preserves the sub-areolar skin thickness in the long term: a matched comparative study with the inverted T technique.
Ardehali B; Nouraei SA; Lim A; Lysakova L; Dex E; Nduka C; Asplund O
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(12):1309-12. PubMed ID: 17662677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gigantomasty: treatment with a short vertical scar.
Heine N; Eisenmann-Klein M; Prantl L
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2008 Jan; 32(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 17874160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Long-term results of the reduction mammaplasty with Revers T-technique].
Hyckel P; Robotta C; Thiel H; Schumann D
Zentralbl Chir; 2001 Oct; 126(10):788-92. PubMed ID: 11727189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The crossed dermal flaps technique for breast reduction.
de la Plaza R; de la Cruz L; Moreno C; Soto L
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(6):383-92. PubMed ID: 15633020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A method to select patients for vertical scar or inverted-T pattern breast reduction.
Dex EA; Asplund O; Ardehali B; Eccles SJ
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1294-302. PubMed ID: 18024253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vertical scar with the bipedicle technique: a modified procedure for breast reduction and mastopexy.
Khan UD
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 17549554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modifications in vertical scar breast reduction.
Beer GM; Morgenthaler W; Spicher I; Meyer VE
Br J Plast Surg; 2001 Jun; 54(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 11355991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current trends in breast reduction.
Roje Z; Roje Z; Milosević M; Varvodić J; Mance M
Coll Antropol; 2012 Jun; 36(2):657-68. PubMed ID: 22856260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Autogenous calvarial bone graft versus reconstruction with alloplastic material in treatment of saddle nose deformities: a two-center comparative study.
Emsen IM; Benlier E
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):466-75. PubMed ID: 18362699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Superior and superomedial pedicle wise-pattern reduction mammaplasty: maximizing cosmesis and minimizing complications.
McCulley SJ; Schaverien MV
Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Aug; 63(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 19542877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Innovations to the vertical reduction mammaplasty: making the transition.
Chen CM; Warren SM; Isik FF
Ann Plast Surg; 2003 Jun; 50(6):579-87. PubMed ID: 12783003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transgender patient satisfaction following reduction mammaplasty.
Nelson L; Whallett EJ; McGregor JC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Mar; 62(3):331-4. PubMed ID: 18083643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Refinements of vertical scar mammaplasty: circumvertical skin excision design with limited inferior pole subdermal undermining and liposculpture of the inframammary crease.
Atiyeh BS; Rubeiz MT; Hayek SN
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2005; 29(6):519-31. PubMed ID: 16328630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Different techniques of reduction mammaplasty comparing clinical and esthetic complications with patient satisfaction].
Stranz G; Petri E
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(9):434-40. PubMed ID: 10522376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Periareolar reduction mammoplasty using an inferior dermal pedicle or a central pedicle.
Cho BC; Yang JD; Baik BS
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 18037359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Which technique for which breast? A prospective study of different techniques of reduction mammaplasty.
Giovanoli P; Meuli-Simmen C; Meyer VE; Frey M
Br J Plast Surg; 1999 Jan; 52(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10343591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
