BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16329022)

  • 1. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
    Yagi J; Adachi K; Arima N; Tanaka S; Ose T; Azumi T; Sasaki H; Sato M; Kinoshita Y
    Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1226-31. PubMed ID: 16329022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
    Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
    Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the effects on cardiopulmonary function of ultrathin transnasal versus normal diameter transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Japan.
    Kawai T; Miyazaki I; Yagi K; Kataoka M; Kawakami K; Yamagishi T; Sofuni A; Itoi T; Moriyasu F; Osaka Y; Takagi Y; Aoki T
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2007; 54(75):770-4. PubMed ID: 17591059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?
    Birkner B; Fritz N; Schatke W; Hasford J
    Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 12929058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation.
    Thota PN; Zuccaro G; Vargo JJ; Conwell DL; Dumot JA; Xu M
    Endoscopy; 2005 Jun; 37(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15933930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and interobserver agreement of small-caliber vs. conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating esophageal varices.
    Pungpapong S; Keaveny A; Raimondo M; Dickson R; Woodward T; Harnois D; Wallace M
    Endoscopy; 2007 Aug; 39(8):673-80. PubMed ID: 17583856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients.
    Murata A; Akahoshi K; Sumida Y; Yamamoto H; Nakamura K; Nawata H
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Apr; 22(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 17376037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feasibility and tolerance of 2-way and 4-way angulation videoscopes for unsedated patients undergoing transnasal EGD in GI cancer screening.
    Tatsumi Y; Harada A; Matsumoto T; Tani T; Nishida H
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 18279865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current status and evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
    Tatsumi Y; Harada A; Matsumoto T; Tani T; Nishida H
    Dig Endosc; 2009 Jul; 21(3):141-6. PubMed ID: 19691759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy in elderly and bedridden patients.
    Yuki M; Amano Y; Komazawa Y; Fukuhara H; Shizuku T; Yamamoto S; Kinoshita Y
    World J Gastroenterol; 2009 Nov; 15(44):5586-91. PubMed ID: 19938199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unsedated transnasal versus transoral sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a one-series prospective study on safety and patient acceptability.
    Stroppa I; Grasso E; Paoluzi OA; Razzini C; Tosti C; Andrei F; Biancone L; Palmieri G; Romeo F; Pallone F
    Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Sep; 40(9):767-75. PubMed ID: 18424197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective comparative study on the acceptability of unsedated transnasal endoscopy in younger versus older patients.
    Murata A; Akahoshi K; Motomura Y; Matsui N; Kubokawa M; Kimura M; Ouchi J; Honda K; Endo S; Nakamura K; Takayanagi R
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Oct; 42(9):965-8. PubMed ID: 18622302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-training in unsedated transnasal EGD by endoscopists competent in standard peroral EGD: prospective assessment of the learning curve.
    Maffei M; Dumortier J; Dumonceau JM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Mar; 67(3):410-8. PubMed ID: 18155215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of cardiopulmonary stress during endoscopy: is unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy appropriate for elderly patients?
    Uchiyama K; Ishikawa T; Sakamoto N; Kajikawa H; Takagi T; Handa O; Tatsumi Y; Yagi N; Naito Y; Itoh Y; Takemura S
    Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jan; 28(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 24288691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Gauze pledgetting versus endoscopic-guided aerosolized spray for nasal anesthesia before transnasal EGD: a prospective, randomized study.
    Hu CT
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jan; 71(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 19748613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Prospective study comparing conventional and transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for routine diagnosis].
    Krakamp B; Parusel M; Saers T
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jan; 129(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 14724781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oolong tea is useful for lens cleansing in transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
    Komazawa Y; Amano Y; Yuki M; Fukuhara H; Mishiro T; Mishiro T; Shizuku T; Kinoshita Y
    Endoscopy; 2010 Feb; 42(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 19967631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biopsy specimens obtained with small-caliber endoscopes have comparable diagnostic performances than those obtained with conventional endoscopes: a prospective study on 1335 specimens.
    Walter T; Chesnay AL; Dumortier J; Mège-LeChevallier F; Hervieu V; Guillaud O; Lapalus MG; Lépilliez V; Fumex F; Ponchon T; Scoazec JY
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Jan; 44(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19661817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the transnasal access for esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine use equal to the transoral route? A prospective, randomized trial.
    Knuth J; Kunze DE; Benz C; Bulian DR; Heiss MM; Lefering R; Saad S; Saers T; Krakamp B
    Z Gastroenterol; 2013 Dec; 51(12):1369-76. PubMed ID: 24146101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective evaluation of a 3.1-mm battery-powered esophagoscope in screening for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
    Madhotra R; Mokhashi M; Willner I; Hawes RH; Reuben A
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Apr; 98(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 12738460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.