These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

43 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16329416)

  • 1. Comparative clinical evaluation between self-adhesive and conventional bulk-fill composites in class II cavities: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    Ellithy MS; Abdelrahman MH; Afifi RR
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Sep; 36(9):1311-1325. PubMed ID: 38655672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical performance of two ion-releasing bulk-fill composites in class I and class II restorations: A two-year evaluation.
    Albelasy EH; Hamama HH; Chew HP; Montasser M; Mahmoud SH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):723-736. PubMed ID: 38174898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of surface sealants on the quality of posterior restorations with bulk-fill composites: A 4-year randomized clinical trial.
    Calazans FS; Ferreira TMJ; Ñaupari-Villasante R; Mendonça RP; Ornellas G; Albuquerque EG; Tardem C; de Miranda MS; Barceleiro MO; Loguercio AD
    Dent Mater; 2024 Mar; 40(3):466-476. PubMed ID: 38142146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What are the emerging trends in dental composite materials in permanent teeth with occlusal cavities: self-adhesive vs traditional?
    Mourão CF; Lowenstein A
    Evid Based Dent; 2024 Mar; 25(1):17-18. PubMed ID: 38182663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Neuroticism on the Prognosis of Nanoceramic and Microhybrid Composite Restoration: A Comparative 1-year Clinical Study.
    Khan SIR; Rao D; Ramachandran A; Ashok BV; Alfadley A
    J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2020; 10(5):613-621. PubMed ID: 33282771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Placement of composites in the masticatory load-bearing posterior region (in German)].
    Manhart J
    Swiss Dent J; 2021 Nov; 131(11):897-910. PubMed ID: 34753282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival and complications of 3D-printed, non-invasive restorations for prosthetic rehabilitations: A 12-month preliminary observational study.
    Prause E; Schmidt F; Unkovskiy A; Beuer F; Hey J
    Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Oct; 0(0):0. PubMed ID: 37823541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The clinical performance of bulk-fill versus the incremental layered application of direct resin composite restorations: a systematic review.
    Sengupta A; Naka O; Mehta SB; Banerji S
    Evid Based Dent; 2023 Sep; 24(3):143. PubMed ID: 37402908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compliance of randomized controlled trials in posterior restorations with the CONSORT statement: a systematic review of methodology.
    Rezende M; Martins ACR; da Silva JA; Reis A; de Geus JL
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):41-64. PubMed ID: 34595606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical Behaviour and Marginal Sealing of Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations Using Light Amplified High-Intensity LEDs Curing: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Fahim SE; Mostafa MA; Abi-Elhassan MH; Taher HM
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Apr; 7(8):1360-1368. PubMed ID: 31110586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective 8-year follow-up of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth of children and adolescents in Public Dental Health Service: reasons for replacement.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW; Halken J; Hallonsten AL; Höigaard R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Apr; 18(3):819-27. PubMed ID: 23873326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite with and without an intermediary layer of flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation.
    Stefanski S; van Dijken JW
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 21104100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites.
    Ilie N; Hickel R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Dec; 13(4):427-38. PubMed ID: 19242739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two years survival rate of class II composite resin restorations prepared by ART with and without a chemomechanical caries removal gel in primary molars.
    Topaloglu-Ak A; Eden E; Frencken JE; Oncag O
    Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Sep; 13(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 19101739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials.
    Drummond JL
    J Dent Res; 2008 Aug; 87(8):710-9. PubMed ID: 18650540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: 2-year follow-up.
    Fagundes TC; Barata TJ; Bresciani E; Cefaly DF; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2006 Sep; 10(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 16823554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites: results at 3.5 years.
    Poon EC; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Nov; 136(11):1533-40. PubMed ID: 16329416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth: results at 12 months.
    Yip KH; Poon BK; Chu FC; Poon EC; Kong FY; Smales RJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Dec; 134(12):1581-9. PubMed ID: 14719754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-year clinical evaluation of a packable resin-based composite.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M; Ozata F
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Sep; 134(9):1205-12. PubMed ID: 14528992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.