These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Two years survival rate of Class II ART restorations in primary molars using two ways to avoid saliva contamination. Carvalho TS; Sampaio FC; Diniz A; Bönecker M; Van Amerongen WE Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 20642474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How to place a gold foil. Henry D Todays FDA; 2009 May; 21(5):22-3. PubMed ID: 19714903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Posterior composite resin restorations. Part 2. Cavity preparation. van der Vyver PJ; Bridges PN SADJ; 2002 May; 57(5):174-80. PubMed ID: 12174713 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Duplicating the form and function of posterior teeth with Class II resin-based composite. Christensen JJ Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):104-8; quiz 109-10. PubMed ID: 22414503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of lining materials under posterior resin composite restorations in the UK. Blum IR; Younis N; Wilson NH J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():66-72. PubMed ID: 27988345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Alternative rubber dam isolation technique for the restoration of Class V cervical lesions. Owens BM Oper Dent; 2006; 31(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 16827034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical use of a sectional matrix and ring. Cho SD; Browning WD; Walton KS Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):587-91. PubMed ID: 20945751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Should a rubber dam be used with composite restorations?]. Roeters FJ Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 Aug; 106(8):311. PubMed ID: 12138863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Simplified Class V matrix for resin restorations. Bauer JG J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Jun; 41(6):665-8. PubMed ID: 286058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]