These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16329748)

  • 1. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the surface characteristics of hydrogel contact lenses.
    Maldonado-Codina C; Efron N
    Clin Exp Optom; 2005 Nov; 88(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 16329748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the mechanical properties of hydrogel contact lenses.
    Maldonado-Codina C; Efron N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):551-61. PubMed ID: 15491483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the clinical performance of hydrogel lenses.
    Maldonado-Codina C; Efron N
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jun; 81(6):442-54. PubMed ID: 15201718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface morphology of contact lenses probed with microscopy techniques.
    Guryca V; Hobzová R; Prádný M; Sirc J; Michálek J
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Sep; 30(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 17507281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic wettability of pHEMA-based hydrogel contact lenses.
    Maldonado-Codina C; Efron N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jul; 26(4):408-18. PubMed ID: 16792741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microscopic observation of unworn siloxane-hydrogel soft contact lenses by atomic force microscopy.
    González-Méijome JM; López-Alemany A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA; Refojo MF
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2006 Feb; 76(2):412-8. PubMed ID: 16184533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of the surface of conventional hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry.
    Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB; Efron N; Canry JC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jun; 81(6):455-60. PubMed ID: 15201719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative performance of soft contact lenses having lathe-cut posterior surfaces with and without additional polishing.
    O'Brien C; Charman WN
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2006 May; 29(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 16701199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy analysis of daily disposable limbal ring contact lenses.
    Lorenz KO; Kakkassery J; Boree D; Pinto D
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Sep; 97(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 24689948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examination of contact lens surfaces by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM).
    Bhatia S; Goldberg EP; Enns JB
    CLAO J; 1997 Oct; 23(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 9348451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surface AFM microscopy of unworn and worn samples of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    González-Méijome JM; López-Alemany A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Jan; 88(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 18618476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Atomic force microscopy analysis of the effect of plasma treatment on gas permeable contact lens surface topography.
    Gill FR; Purslow C; Murphy PJ
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2019 Jun; 42(3):265-272. PubMed ID: 30808597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Morphological Properties of Siloxane-Hydrogel Contact Lens Surfaces.
    Stach S; Ţălu Ş; Trabattoni S; Tavazzi S; Głuchaczka A; Siek P; Zając J; Giovanzana S
    Curr Eye Res; 2017 Apr; 42(4):498-505. PubMed ID: 27610546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft contact lens surface profile by atomic force microscopy.
    Giraldez MJ; Serra C; Lira M; Real Oliveira ME; Yebra-Pimentel E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 87(7):E475-81. PubMed ID: 20473237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hydrogel contact lens-corneal interactions: a new mechanism for deposit formation and corneal injury.
    Goldberg EP; Bhatia S; Enns JB
    CLAO J; 1997 Oct; 23(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 9348448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the Lubricity and Surface Roughness of 5 Cosmetic Contact Lenses.
    Lau C; Tosatti S; Mundorf M; Ebare K; Osborn Lorenz K
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2(2):S256-S265. PubMed ID: 29570118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Friction studies of hydrogel contact lenses using AFM: non-crosslinked polymers of low friction at the surface.
    Kim SH; Marmo C; Somorjai GA
    Biomaterials; 2001 Dec; 22(24):3285-94. PubMed ID: 11700800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Scanning electron microscopy of deposits remaining in soft contact lens polishing marks after cleaning.
    Fowler SA; Gaertner KL
    CLAO J; 1990; 16(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 2379309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of pigment location in tinted soft contact lenses.
    Jung JW; Han SH; Kim SA; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Jun; 39(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 26851138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AFM and SFG studies of pHEMA-based hydrogel contact lens surfaces in saline solution: adhesion, friction, and the presence of non-crosslinked polymer chains at the surface.
    Kim SH; Opdahl A; Marmo C; Somorjai GA
    Biomaterials; 2002 Apr; 23(7):1657-66. PubMed ID: 11922469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.