188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16329748)
1. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the surface characteristics of hydrogel contact lenses.
Maldonado-Codina C; Efron N
Clin Exp Optom; 2005 Nov; 88(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 16329748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the mechanical properties of hydrogel contact lenses.
Maldonado-Codina C; Efron N
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):551-61. PubMed ID: 15491483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the clinical performance of hydrogel lenses.
Maldonado-Codina C; Efron N
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jun; 81(6):442-54. PubMed ID: 15201718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surface morphology of contact lenses probed with microscopy techniques.
Guryca V; Hobzová R; Prádný M; Sirc J; Michálek J
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 Sep; 30(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 17507281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic wettability of pHEMA-based hydrogel contact lenses.
Maldonado-Codina C; Efron N
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jul; 26(4):408-18. PubMed ID: 16792741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microscopic observation of unworn siloxane-hydrogel soft contact lenses by atomic force microscopy.
González-Méijome JM; López-Alemany A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA; Refojo MF
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2006 Feb; 76(2):412-8. PubMed ID: 16184533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of the surface of conventional hydrogel and silicone hydrogel contact lenses by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry.
Maldonado-Codina C; Morgan PB; Efron N; Canry JC
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jun; 81(6):455-60. PubMed ID: 15201719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relative performance of soft contact lenses having lathe-cut posterior surfaces with and without additional polishing.
O'Brien C; Charman WN
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2006 May; 29(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 16701199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy analysis of daily disposable limbal ring contact lenses.
Lorenz KO; Kakkassery J; Boree D; Pinto D
Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Sep; 97(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 24689948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examination of contact lens surfaces by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM).
Bhatia S; Goldberg EP; Enns JB
CLAO J; 1997 Oct; 23(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 9348451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface AFM microscopy of unworn and worn samples of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
González-Méijome JM; López-Alemany A; Almeida JB; Parafita MA
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2009 Jan; 88(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 18618476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atomic force microscopy analysis of the effect of plasma treatment on gas permeable contact lens surface topography.
Gill FR; Purslow C; Murphy PJ
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2019 Jun; 42(3):265-272. PubMed ID: 30808597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Morphological Properties of Siloxane-Hydrogel Contact Lens Surfaces.
Stach S; Ţălu Ş; Trabattoni S; Tavazzi S; Głuchaczka A; Siek P; Zając J; Giovanzana S
Curr Eye Res; 2017 Apr; 42(4):498-505. PubMed ID: 27610546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Soft contact lens surface profile by atomic force microscopy.
Giraldez MJ; Serra C; Lira M; Real Oliveira ME; Yebra-Pimentel E
Optom Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 87(7):E475-81. PubMed ID: 20473237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hydrogel contact lens-corneal interactions: a new mechanism for deposit formation and corneal injury.
Goldberg EP; Bhatia S; Enns JB
CLAO J; 1997 Oct; 23(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 9348448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the Lubricity and Surface Roughness of 5 Cosmetic Contact Lenses.
Lau C; Tosatti S; Mundorf M; Ebare K; Osborn Lorenz K
Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2(2):S256-S265. PubMed ID: 29570118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Friction studies of hydrogel contact lenses using AFM: non-crosslinked polymers of low friction at the surface.
Kim SH; Marmo C; Somorjai GA
Biomaterials; 2001 Dec; 22(24):3285-94. PubMed ID: 11700800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scanning electron microscopy of deposits remaining in soft contact lens polishing marks after cleaning.
Fowler SA; Gaertner KL
CLAO J; 1990; 16(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 2379309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of pigment location in tinted soft contact lenses.
Jung JW; Han SH; Kim SA; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Jun; 39(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 26851138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. AFM and SFG studies of pHEMA-based hydrogel contact lens surfaces in saline solution: adhesion, friction, and the presence of non-crosslinked polymer chains at the surface.
Kim SH; Opdahl A; Marmo C; Somorjai GA
Biomaterials; 2002 Apr; 23(7):1657-66. PubMed ID: 11922469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
