399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16330056)
1. Competition between simultaneous stimuli modulated by location probability in hemispatial neglect.
Geng JJ; Behrmann M
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1050-60. PubMed ID: 16330056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?
Snow JC; Mattingley JB
Brain; 2006 Jan; 129(Pt 1):168-81. PubMed ID: 16317021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
Ptak R; Golay L
Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Classification images of two right hemisphere patients: a window into the attentional mechanisms of spatial neglect.
Shimozaki S; Kingstone A; Olk B; Stowe R; Eckstein M
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):26-52. PubMed ID: 16497281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of perceptual load in neglect: rejection of ipsilesional distractors is facilitated with higher central load.
Lavie N; Robertson IH
J Cogn Neurosci; 2001 Oct; 13(7):867-76. PubMed ID: 11595091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reflexive orienting in spatial neglect is biased towards behaviourally salient stimuli.
Ptak R; Schnider A
Cereb Cortex; 2006 Mar; 16(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 15901652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Seeing fearful body language overcomes attentional deficits in patients with neglect.
Tamietto M; Geminiani G; Genero R; de Gelder B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Mar; 19(3):445-54. PubMed ID: 17335393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic modulation of visual detection by auditory cues in spatial neglect.
Golay L; Hauert CA; Greber C; Schnider A; Ptak R
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(9):1258-65. PubMed ID: 15949510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of dynamic bottom-up features and top-down control on the visual exploration of moving real-world scenes in hemispatial neglect.
Machner B; Dorr M; Sprenger A; von der Gablentz J; Heide W; Barth E; Helmchen C
Neuropsychologia; 2012 Aug; 50(10):2415-25. PubMed ID: 22750122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Repetition of distractor sets improves visual search performance in hemispatial neglect.
Saevarsson S; Jóelsdóttir S; Hjaltason H; Kristjánsson A
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):1161-9. PubMed ID: 18068736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What kind of visual spatial attention is impaired in neglect?
Natale E; Posteraro L; Prior M; Marzi CA
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(7):1072-85. PubMed ID: 15769493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of auditory and visual linguistic distractors on target localization.
Mayer AR; Kosson DS
Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 15099147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional responses to unattended stimuli in human parietal cortex.
Vandenberghe R; Geeraerts S; Molenberghs P; Lafosse C; Vandenbulcke M; Peeters K; Peeters R; Van Hecke P; Orban GA
Brain; 2005 Dec; 128(Pt 12):2843-57. PubMed ID: 15857928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
Fujisaki W; Nishida S
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impaired visual processing of contralesional stimuli in neglect patients: a visual-evoked potential study.
Di Russo F; Aprile T; Spitoni G; Spinelli D
Brain; 2008 Mar; 131(Pt 3):842-54. PubMed ID: 18024488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Left neglect dyslexia and the effect of stimulus duration.
Arduino LS; Vallar G; Burani C
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):662-5. PubMed ID: 16129460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
Stenneken P; van Eimeren L; Keller I; Jacobs AM; Kerkhoff G
Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():166-78. PubMed ID: 18054900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A psychophysical study of visual extinction: ipsilesional distractor interference with contralesional orientation thresholds in visual hemineglect patients.
Geeraerts S; Lafosse C; Vandenbussche E; Verfaillie K
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):530-41. PubMed ID: 15716143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The attentional white bear phenomenon: the mandatory allocation of attention to expected distractor locations.
Tsal Y; Makovski T
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):351-63. PubMed ID: 16634675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
