These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16332547)
1. Progress testing with short answer questions. Rademakers J; Ten Cate TJ; Bär PR Med Teach; 2005 Nov; 27(7):578-82. PubMed ID: 16332547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A modified electronic key feature examination for undergraduate medical students: validation threats and opportunities. Fischer MR; Kopp V; Holzer M; Ruderich F; Jünger J Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):450-5. PubMed ID: 16147800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Competence in the musculoskeletal system: assessing the progression of knowledge through an undergraduate medical course. Basu S; Roberts C; Newble DI; Snaith M Med Educ; 2004 Dec; 38(12):1253-60. PubMed ID: 15566536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differences in knowledge development exposed by multi-curricular progress test data. Muijtjens AM; Schuwirth LW; Cohen-Schotanus J; van der Vleuten CP Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Dec; 13(5):593-605. PubMed ID: 17479352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between Long-Menu and Open-Ended Questions in computerized medical assessments. A randomized controlled trial. Rotthoff T; Baehring T; Dicken HD; Fahron U; Richter B; Fischer MR; Scherbaum WA BMC Med Educ; 2006 Oct; 6():50. PubMed ID: 17032439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are extended-matching multiple-choice items appropriate for a final test in medical education? Beullens J; Van Damme B; Jaspaert H; Janssen PJ Med Teach; 2002 Jul; 24(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 12193322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of spatial anatomical knowledge with a 'three-dimensional multiple choice test' (3D-MC). Schubert S; Schnabel KP; Winkelmann A Med Teach; 2009 Jan; 31(1):e13-7. PubMed ID: 19253152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A new, problem oriented medicine curriculum in Utrecht: less basic science knowledge]. Keijsers CJ; Custers EJ; ten Cate OT Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():B400. PubMed ID: 19785897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do extended matching multiple-choice questions measure clinical reasoning? Beullens J; Struyf E; Van Damme B Med Educ; 2005 Apr; 39(4):410-7. PubMed ID: 15813764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of visual pharmacology education across an integrated medical school curriculum. Franson KL; Dubois EA; van Gerven JM; Cohen AF J Vis Commun Med; 2007 Dec; 30(4):156-61. PubMed ID: 18266135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education. Downing SM Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of essay questions used to assess medical students' application and integration of basic and clinical science knowledge. Bierer SB; Taylor CA; Dannefer EF Teach Learn Med; 2009 Oct; 21(4):344-50. PubMed ID: 20183362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Progress testing in resource-poor countries: a case from Mozambique. Aarts R; Steidel K; Manuel BA; Driessen EW Med Teach; 2010; 32(6):461-3. PubMed ID: 20515372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. It takes only 100 true-false items to test medical students: true or false? Pamphlett R Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 16147803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing and contrasting undergraduate competence in musculoskeletal medicine with cardiovascular medicine and neurology. Basu S; Roberts C; Newble DI; Snaith ML Rheumatology (Oxford); 2004 Nov; 43(11):1398-401. PubMed ID: 15304671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oncology Knowledge Inventory for undergraduate students. Longman AJ; Verran JA; Clark M Oncol Nurs Forum; 1991; 18(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 2003102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Answering multiple-choice questions in high-stakes medical examinations. Fischer MR; Herrmann S; Kopp V Med Educ; 2005 Sep; 39(9):890-4. PubMed ID: 16150028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The evaluation of a peer-led question-writing task. Nwosu A; Mason S; Roberts A; Hugel H Clin Teach; 2013 Jun; 10(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 23656675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]