These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
49. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. Hatcher DC; Dial C; Mayorga C J Calif Dent Assoc; 2003 Nov; 31(11):825-33. PubMed ID: 14696834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Craniofacial imaging in orthodontics: historical perspective, current status, and future developments. Quintero JC; Trosien A; Hatcher D; Kapila S Angle Orthod; 1999 Dec; 69(6):491-506. PubMed ID: 10593439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. In the Beginning. A Look at the Genesis of CT Scanning. Feuerstein P Dent Today; 2015 Mar; 34(3):28. PubMed ID: 26349267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. 3-D imaging of the temporomandibular joint: a current perspective. Lam K Penn Dent J (Phila); 1987; 88(1-2):3-7. PubMed ID: 15496015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Three-dimensional surface imaging of the face. Hatcher DC; Dial C J Calif Dent Assoc; 2009 Mar; 37(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 19830985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Cone beam volumetric tomography vs. medical CT scanners. Winter AA; Pollack AS; Frommer HH; Koenig L N Y State Dent J; 2005; 71(4):28-33. PubMed ID: 16146304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in determining the location of the genial tubercle. Hueman EM; Noujeim ME; Langlais RP; Prihoda TJ; Miller FR Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Jul; 137(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 17599577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Cone beam computed tomography. Small BW Gen Dent; 2007; 55(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 17511357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Condylar and mandibular morphological criteria in the 2D and 3D MSCT imaging for patients with Class II division 1 subdivision malocclusion. Krisjane Z; Urtane I; Krumina G; Bieza A; Zepa K; Rogovska I Stomatologija; 2007; 9(3):67-71. PubMed ID: 17993738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Dosimetric characterization of a cone-beam O-arm imaging system. Zhang J; Weir V; Fajardo L; Lin J; Hsiung H; Ritenour ER J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):305-17. PubMed ID: 19923687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Scarfe WC; Farman AG Dent Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 52(4):707-30, v. PubMed ID: 18805225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]