114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16333166)
1. Method for determination of the mean fraction of glandular tissue in individual female breasts using mammography.
Jansen JT; Veldkamp WJ; Thijssen MA; van Woudenberg S; Zoetelief J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(24):5953-67. PubMed ID: 16333166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Glandularity and mean glandular dose determined for individual women at four regional breast cancer screening units in the Netherlands.
Zoetelief J; Veldkamp WJ; Thijssen MA; Jansen JT
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(7):1807-17. PubMed ID: 16552106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of mean glandular dose versus compressed breast thickness relationship for mammography.
Bor D; Tukel S; Olgar T; Toklu T; Aydin E; Akyol O
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):160-4. PubMed ID: 18420560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Average glandular dose conversion coefficients for segmented breast voxel models.
Zankl M; Fill U; Hoeschen C; Panzer W; Regulla D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):410-4. PubMed ID: 15933148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms.
Dance DR; Hunt RA; Bakic PR; Maidment AD; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Alm Carlsson G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):359-63. PubMed ID: 15933137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Composition of mammographic phantom materials.
Geise RA; Palchevsky A
Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):347-50. PubMed ID: 8596830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammography radiation dose: initial results from Serbia based on mean glandular dose assessment for phantoms and patients.
Ciraj-Bjelac O; Beciric S; Arandjic D; Kosutic D; Kovacevic M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Jun; 140(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 20159918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of equivalent breast phantoms for different age groups of Taiwanese women: an experimental approach.
Dong SL; Chu TC; Lin YC; Lan GY; Yeh YH; Chen S; Chuanga KS
Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4094-100. PubMed ID: 21859009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prediction of glandularity and breast radiation dose from mammography results in Japanese women.
Yamamuro M; Asai Y; Yamada K; Ozaki Y; Matsumoto M; Murakami T
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2019 Jan; 57(1):289-298. PubMed ID: 30099671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of mean glandular dose in a full-field digital mammography unit in Tabriz, Iran.
Alizadeh Riabi H; Mehnati P; Mesbahi A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):222-7. PubMed ID: 20823039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model.
Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Liu H; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2503-2514. PubMed ID: 28295395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of European protocol in the evaluation of contrast-to-noise ratio and mean glandular dose for two digital mammography systems.
Muhogora WE; Devetti A; Padovani R; Msaki P; Bonutti F
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):231-6. PubMed ID: 18283065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
Helvie MA; Chan HP; Adler DD; Boyd PG
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 7992731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Large breasts, small breasts; which mammographic technic?].
Hessler C; Depeursinge C; Grecescu M; Raimondi S; Valley JF
J Radiol; 1986 Feb; 67(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 3712313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
Vassileva J; Avramova-Cholakova S; Dimov A; Lichev A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients.
Klein R; Aichinger H; Dierker J; Jansen JT; Joite-Barfuss S; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Zoetelief J
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Apr; 42(4):651-71. PubMed ID: 9127443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of breast dose in five screening mammography centres in Greece.
Tsapaki V; Tsalafoutas IA; Poga V; Louizi A; Kottou S; Koulentianos E
J Radiol Prot; 2008 Sep; 28(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 18714130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of mean glandular dose in mammography.
Faulkner K; Law J; Robson KJ
Br J Radiol; 1995 Aug; 68(812):877-81. PubMed ID: 7551786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A survey of clinical factors and patient dose in mammography.
Kruger RL; Schueler BA
Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1449-54. PubMed ID: 11488578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
