These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1633399)

  • 21. Valve and great vessel stenosis: assessment with MR jet velocity mapping.
    Kilner PJ; Firmin DN; Rees RS; Martinez J; Pennell DJ; Mohiaddin RH; Underwood SR; Longmore DB
    Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):229-35. PubMed ID: 1984310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Velocity profiles in stenosed tube models using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Rittgers SE; Fei DY; Kraft KA; Fatouros PP; Kishore PR
    J Biomech Eng; 1988 Aug; 110(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 3172736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. MR angiography without subtraction.
    Zur Y; Zou X; Neuringer LJ
    Magn Reson Med; 1991 Jun; 19(2):361-72. PubMed ID: 1881326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of flow through simulated vascular stenoses with gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging.
    Podolak MJ; Hedlund LW; Evans AJ; Herfkens RJ
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Mar; 24(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 2753632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Poststenotic signal loss in MR angiography: effects of echo time, flow compensation, and fractional echo.
    Evans AJ; Richardson DB; Tien R; MacFall JR; Hedlund LW; Heinz ER; Boyko O; Sostman HD
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1993; 14(3):721-9. PubMed ID: 8517365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computational simulation of turbulent signal loss in 2D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiograms.
    Siegel JM; Oshinski JN; Pettigrew RI; Ku DN
    Magn Reson Med; 1997 Apr; 37(4):609-14. PubMed ID: 9094084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of acceleration on the accuracy of MR phase velocity measurements.
    Oshinski JN; Ku DN; Bohning DE; Pettigrew RI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 1446110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. MR angiography: present and future.
    Edelman RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 8517285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Understanding acceleration-induced displacement artifacts in phase-contrast MR velocity measurements.
    Frayne R; Rutt BK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 7766984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Flow of couple stress fluid through stenotic blood vessels.
    Srivastava LM
    J Biomech; 1985; 18(7):479-85. PubMed ID: 4030804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Real-time interactive color flow MR imaging.
    Riederer SJ; Wright RC; Ehman RL; Rossman PJ; Holsinger-Bampton AE; Hangiandreou NJ; Grimm RC
    Radiology; 1991 Oct; 181(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 1887053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Time-of-flight methods in MR angiography.
    Smith KW
    Radiol Technol; 1994; 65(3):159-70; quiz 171-3. PubMed ID: 8127955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Non spiral and spiral (helical) flow patterns in stenoses. In vitro observations using spin and gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computational fluid dynamic modeling.
    Stonebridge PA; Buckley C; Thompson A; Dick J; Hunter G; Chudek JA; Houston JG; Belch JJ
    Int Angiol; 2004 Sep; 23(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 15765044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An asymmetric slice profile: spatial alteration of flow signal response in 3D time-of-flight NMR angiography.
    Matsuda T; Morii I; Kohno F; Asato R; Ikezaki Y; Yoshitome E; Sasayama S
    Magn Reson Med; 1993 Jun; 29(6):783-9. PubMed ID: 8350721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Evaluation of the detectability of vascular stenosis using non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography with various electrocardiographically-gated three-dimensional fast spin echo sequences].
    Izuno Y; Hiai Y; Yoneda T; Okigawa T; Ohta T; Noda S; Toyonari N; Sakemoto T; Ichikawa K; Tomiguchi S
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(7):817-24. PubMed ID: 22821154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Time-of-flight MR angiography.
    Nishimura DG
    Magn Reson Med; 1990 May; 14(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 2345502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Motion artifact reduction in MR imaging of the abdomen: gradient moment nulling versus respiratory-sorted phase encoding.
    Mitchell DG; Vinitski S; Burk DL; Levy DW; Rifkin MD
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):155-60. PubMed ID: 3420252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contrast-to-noise ratios in maximum intensity projection images.
    Brown DG; Riederer SJ
    Magn Reson Med; 1992 Jan; 23(1):130-7. PubMed ID: 1734175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Magnetic resonance angiography.
    Gomes AS
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1992 Aug; 4(4):102-9. PubMed ID: 1627442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. MRA studies of arterial stenosis: improvements by diastolic acquisition.
    Saloner D; Selby K; Anderson CM
    Magn Reson Med; 1994 Feb; 31(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 8133755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.