These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16334061)

  • 1. When do irrelevant visual stimuli impair processing of identical targets?
    Wühr P; Müsseler J
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jul; 67(5):897-909. PubMed ID: 16334061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of distractors in multiple object tracking are modulated by the similarity of distractor and target features.
    Feria CS
    Perception; 2012; 41(3):287-304. PubMed ID: 22808583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adaptability and specificity of inhibition processes in distractor-induced blindness.
    Winther GN; Niedeggen M
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Dec; 54(12):1882-1898. PubMed ID: 28892157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Irrelevant auditory and visual events induce a visual attentional blink.
    Van der Burg E; Nieuwenstein MR; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):80-9. PubMed ID: 23047915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load.
    Tellinghuisen DJ; Nowak EJ
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):817-28. PubMed ID: 12956588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distraction by deviance: comparing the effects of auditory and visual deviant stimuli on auditory and visual target processing.
    Leiva A; Parmentier FB; Andrés P
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 25270560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of distractor load and temporal target-distractor separation on numerical comparison performance: a stimulus-competition approach.
    Paas F; Adam JJ
    Psychol Rep; 2002 Jun; 90(3 Pt 1):889-906. PubMed ID: 12090526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Manipulations of distractor frequency do not mitigate emotion-induced blindness.
    Zhao JL; Most SB
    Cogn Emot; 2019 May; 33(3):442-451. PubMed ID: 29644917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is attention essential for inducing synesthetic colors? Evidence from oculomotor distractors.
    Nijboer TC; Van der Stigchel S
    J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):21.1-9. PubMed ID: 19761312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repetition blindness in priming in perceptual identification: Competitive effects of a word intervening between prime and target.
    Burt JS; Jolley J
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Oct; 45(7):1171-1181. PubMed ID: 28646419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
    Parks NA; Hilimire MR; Corballis PM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 May; 23(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 20146614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conflict-induced perceptual filtering.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):675-86. PubMed ID: 22004199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When vision influences the invisible distractor: tactile response compatibility effects require vision.
    Wesslein AK; Spence C; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):763-74. PubMed ID: 24245501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the fate of distractor stimuli in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Dux PE; Coltheart V; Harris IM
    Cognition; 2006 Apr; 99(3):355-82. PubMed ID: 15993401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distractor-induced blindness for orientation changes and coherent motion.
    Michael L; Hesselmann G; Kiefer M; Niedeggen M
    Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1781-7. PubMed ID: 21703293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The mutations paradigm: assessing the time course of distractor processing.
    Max R; Tsal Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2344-55. PubMed ID: 26084775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays?
    Scolari M; Kohnen A; Barton B; Awh E
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):7.1-23. PubMed ID: 18217822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strategic control over extent and timing of distractor-based response activation.
    Jost K; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Löw A; Jacobsen T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Feb; 43(2):326-333. PubMed ID: 27732019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual identity and uncertainty in repetition blindness.
    Brill GA; Glass AL; Rashid H; Hussey E
    Am J Psychol; 2008; 121(3):409-49. PubMed ID: 18792718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The visual properties of proximal and remote distractors differentially influence reaching planning times: evidence from pro- and antipointing tasks.
    Heath M; DeSimone JC
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 234(11):3259-3268. PubMed ID: 27405998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.