105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16334410)
1. [Evaluation of a city-wide comprehensive community intervention program for health promotion with residents' associations and specific task forces in Masuda city].
Kataoka D
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2005 Oct; 52(10):898-905. PubMed ID: 16334410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating the effectiveness of a multi-component intervention to improve health in an inner-city Havana community.
Spiegel J; Bonet M; Yassi A; Tate RB; Concepción M; Cañizares M
Int J Occup Environ Health; 2003; 9(2):118-27. PubMed ID: 12848239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A naturalistic inquiry on the impact of interventions aiming to improve health and the quality of life in the community.
Sogoric S; Middleton J; Lang S; Ivankovic D; Kern J
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Jan; 60(1):153-64. PubMed ID: 15482875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [An interview survey for health promotion for older residents in T District, Sendai City].
Suzuki Y; Okazaki F; Kobayashi J; Suzuki S
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2004 Jan; 51(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 14994501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dissecting the "black box" of community intervention: lessons from community-wide cardiovascular disease prevention programs in the US and Sweden.
Pearson TA; Wall S; Lewis C; Jenkins PL; Nafziger A; Weinehall L
Scand J Public Health Suppl; 2001; 56():69-78. PubMed ID: 11681566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementing community-based participatory research centers in diverse urban settings.
Higgins DL; Metzler M
J Urban Health; 2001 Sep; 78(3):488-94. PubMed ID: 11564851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of quality-of-life initiatives in health promotion.
Raphael D
WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser; 2001; (92):123-47. PubMed ID: 11729769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Tobacco-free parks: maximizing health impact in built environment planning.
Shoe E
N C Med J; 2012; 73(4):287-8. PubMed ID: 23033717
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Otsego-Schoharie healthy heart program: prevention of cardiovascular disease in the rural US.
Nafziger AN; Erb TA; Jenkins PL; Lewis C; Pearson TA
Scand J Public Health Suppl; 2001; 56():21-32. PubMed ID: 11681560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can a sustainable community intervention reduce the health gap?--10-year evaluation of a Swedish community intervention program for the prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Weinehall L; Hellsten G; Boman K; Hallmans G; Asplund K; Wall S
Scand J Public Health Suppl; 2001; 56():59-68. PubMed ID: 11681565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prevention of cardiovascular disease in Sweden: the Norsjö community intervention programme--motives, methods and intervention components.
Weinehall L; Hellsten G; Boman K; Hallmans G
Scand J Public Health Suppl; 2001; 56():13-20. PubMed ID: 11681559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Different outcomes for different interventions with different focus!--A cross-country comparison of community interventions in rural Swedish and US populations.
Weinehall L; Lewis C; Nafziger AN; Jenkins PL; Erb TA; Pearson TA; Wall S
Scand J Public Health Suppl; 2001; 56():46-58. PubMed ID: 11681563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Kaiser Family Foundation Community Health Promotion Grants Program: findings from an outcome evaluation.
Wagner EH; Wickizer TM; Cheadle A; Psaty BM; Koepsell TD; Diehr P; Curry SJ; Von Korff M; Anderman C; Beery WL; Pearson DC; Perrin EB
Health Serv Res; 2000 Aug; 35(3):561-89. PubMed ID: 10966086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determinants of health promotion action: comparative analysis of local voluntary associations in four municipalities in Finland.
Simonsen-Rehn N; Øvretveit J; Laamanen R; Suominen S; Sundell J; Brommels M
Health Promot Int; 2006 Dec; 21(4):274-83. PubMed ID: 16861723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Healthy City Kwachon 21 Project: a community health promotion programme in Korea.
Kim HJ
Asia Pac J Public Health; 2000; 12 Suppl():S67-70. PubMed ID: 11338743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Public health: Seattle and King County's push for the built environment.
Roof K; Oleru N
J Environ Health; 2008; 71(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 18724501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementation of the Healthy Cities' principles and strategies: an evaluation of the Israel Healthy Cities network.
Donchin M; Shemesh AA; Horowitz P; Daoud N
Health Promot Int; 2006 Dec; 21(4):266-73. PubMed ID: 16855012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of Duke University's LIVE FOR LIFE health promotion program on changes in worker absenteeism.
Knight KK; Goetzel RZ; Fielding JE; Eisen M; Jackson GW; Kahr TY; Kenny GM; Wade SW; Duann S
J Occup Med; 1994 May; 36(5):533-6. PubMed ID: 8027878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolution of the WHO city health profiles: a content review.
Webster P; Lipp A
Health Promot Int; 2009 Nov; 24 Suppl 1():i56-i63. PubMed ID: 19914989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Project Dil: a co-ordinated Primary Care and Community Health Promotion Programme for reducing risk factors of coronary heart disease amongst the South Asian community of Leicester--experiences and evaluation of the project.
Farooqi A; Bhavsar M
Ethn Health; 2001; 6(3-4):265-70. PubMed ID: 11696936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
