These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16334851)

  • 1. Impact of digital imaging on radiation doses to the patient during X-ray examination of the urinary tract.
    Sjöholm B; Geijer H; Persliden J
    Acta Radiol; 2005 Oct; 46(6):657-61. PubMed ID: 16334851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study.
    Geijer H; Beckman KW; Andersson T; Persliden J
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 11511892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction of absorbed dose in storage phosphor urography by significant lowering of tube voltage and adjustment of image display parameters.
    Wiltz HJ; Petersen U; Axelsson B
    Acta Radiol; 2005 Jul; 46(4):391-5. PubMed ID: 16134316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing the radiation dose during excretory urography: flat-panel silicon x-ray detector versus computed radiography.
    Zähringer M; Hesselmann V; Schulte O; Kamm KF; Braun W; Haupt G; Krug B; Lackner K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):931-7. PubMed ID: 14500204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
    Ludwig K; Ahlers K; Wormanns D; Freund M; Bernhardt TM; Diederich S; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of subtle undisplaced rib fractures in a porcine model: radiation dose requirement--digital flat-panel versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems.
    Ludwig K; Schülke C; Diederich S; Wormanns D; Lenzen H; Bernhardt TM; Brinckmann P; Heindel W
    Radiology; 2003 Apr; 227(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 12615999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography at different exposure doses versus mammography film: possibility of radiation dose reduction in detecting rheumatologic bone defects.
    Zähringer M; Reineck S; Perniok A; Krüger K; Andermahr J; Rubbert A; Winnekendonk G
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 18300139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
    Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Digital radiography: from storage phosphor plates to direct detector systems].
    Schaefer-Prokop C; Uffmann M; Stadler A
    Wien Med Wochenschr Suppl; 2002; (113):30-4. PubMed ID: 12621834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.
    Ludwig K; Henschel A; Bernhardt TM; Lenzen H; Wormanns D; Diederich S; Heindel W
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Jun; 13(6):1316-23. PubMed ID: 12764648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A real-time flat-panel X-ray pixel imaging system for low-dose medical diagnostics and craniofacial applications.
    Chapuy S; Dimcovski D; Dimcovski Z; Grigoriev E; Grob E; Ligier Y; Pachoud M; Riondel F; Rüfenacht D; Sayegh C; Terrier F; Valley JF; Verdun FR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jan; 11(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 11314093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimisation of tube voltage for conventional urography using a Gd2O2S:Tb flat panel detector.
    Zachrisson S; Hansson J; Cederblad A; Geterud K; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):86-91. PubMed ID: 20223848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Reduction method of patients' radiation dose considering the size of field of view with a digital cine X-ray system loading a flat-panel detector].
    Kato M; Chida K; Yoshida K; Sasaki F; Sasaki M; Oosaka H; Tosa T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(11):1443-7. PubMed ID: 22104237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simulated bone erosions in a hand phantom: detection with conventional screen-film technology versus cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
    Strotzer M; Völk M; Wild T; von Landenberg P; Feuerbach S
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):512-5. PubMed ID: 10796933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose-image optimisation in digital radiology with a direct digital detector: an example applied to pelvic examinations.
    Persliden J; Beckman KW; Geijer H; Andersson T
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Jun; 12(6):1584-8. PubMed ID: 12042972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
    Busch HP; Busch S; Decker C; Schilz C
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose.
    Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl HG; Molander B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.