These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16334894)

  • 1. Subspace algorithms for noise reduction in cochlear implants.
    Loizou PC; Lobo A; Hu Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):2791-3. PubMed ID: 16334894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC; Li N; Kasturi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 17902741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech enhancement based on neural networks improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implant users.
    Goehring T; Bolner F; Monaghan JJ; van Dijk B; Zarowski A; Bleeck S
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():183-194. PubMed ID: 27913315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Voice Track multiband single-channel modified Wiener-filter noise reduction system for cochlear implants: patients' outcomes and subjective appraisal.
    Guevara N; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Bebear JP; Ardoint M; Saaï S; Gnansia D; Hoen M; Romanet P; Lavieille JP
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Aug; 55(8):431-8. PubMed ID: 27108635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sparse Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Strategy for Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Lutman ME; Ewert SD; Li G; Bleeck S
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
    Spriet A; Van Deun L; Eftaxiadis K; Laneau J; Moonen M; van Dijk B; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital signal processing (DSP) applications for multiband loudness correction digital hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Dillier N; Frölich T; Kompis M; Bögli H; Lai WK
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 8263833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A wavelet-based noise reduction algorithm and its clinical evaluation in cochlear implants.
    Ye H; Deng G; Mauger SJ; Hersbach AA; Dawson PW; Heasman JM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75662. PubMed ID: 24086605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-time automatic switching between noise suppression algorithms for deployment in cochlear implants.
    Gopalakrishna V; Kehtarnavaz N; Loizou PC; Panahi I
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():863-6. PubMed ID: 21097196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A beamformer post-filter for cochlear implant noise reduction.
    Hersbach AA; Grayden DB; Fallon JB; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2412-20. PubMed ID: 23556606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear implant optimized noise reduction.
    Mauger SJ; Arora K; Dawson PW
    J Neural Eng; 2012 Dec; 9(6):065007. PubMed ID: 23187159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise.
    Nie K; Stickney G; Zeng FG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jan; 52(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 15651565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A high rate n-of-m speech processing strategy for the first generation Clarion cochlear implant.
    Buechner A; Frohne-Buechner C; Boyle P; Battmer RD; Lenarz T
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Dec; 48(12):868-75. PubMed ID: 20017683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech understanding performance of cochlear implant subjects using time-frequency masking-based noise reduction.
    Qazi Ou; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 May; 59(5):1364-73. PubMed ID: 22345522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of Noise Reduction Algorithm ClearVoice in Cochlear Implant Processing: Effects on Noise Tolerance and Speech Intelligibility in Noise in Relation to Spectral Resolution.
    Dingemanse JG; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):357-67. PubMed ID: 25479412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spectral contrast enhancement improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implants.
    Nogueira W; Rode T; Büchner A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):728-39. PubMed ID: 26936556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Single-trial subspace-based approach for VEP extraction.
    Kamel N; Yusoff MZ; Hani AF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 May; 58(5):1383-93. PubMed ID: 21177154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noise reduction technologies implemented in head-worn preprocessors for improving cochlear implant performance in reverberant noise fields.
    Chung K; Nelson L; Teske M
    Hear Res; 2012 Sep; 291(1-2):41-51. PubMed ID: 22750449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.