BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16334904)

  • 1. Thresholds for second formant transitions in front vowels.
    Kewley-Port D; Goodman SS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):3252-60. PubMed ID: 16334904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vowel formant discrimination for high-fidelity speech.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1224-33. PubMed ID: 15376687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. English vowel identification and vowel formant discrimination by native Mandarin Chinese- and native English-speaking listeners: The effect of vowel duration dependence.
    Mi L; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q; Guan J; Liu C
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():58-65. PubMed ID: 26768853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting vowel formant discrimination by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2855-64. PubMed ID: 18189575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vowel formant discrimination II: Effects of stimulus uncertainty, consonantal context, and training.
    Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2141-55. PubMed ID: 11681391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fundamental frequency effects on thresholds for vowel formant discrimination.
    Kewley-Port D; Li X; Zheng Y; Neel AT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2462-70. PubMed ID: 8865651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. F2 slope as a Perceptual Cue for the Front-Back Contrast in Standard Southern British English.
    Chládková K; Hamann S; Williams D; Hellmuth S
    Lang Speech; 2017 Sep; 60(3):377-398. PubMed ID: 28915781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Thresholds for formant-frequency discrimination of vowels in consonantal context.
    Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 May; 97(5 Pt 1):3139-46. PubMed ID: 7759654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vowel discrimination in cats: thresholds for the detection of second formant changes in the vowel /epsilon/.
    Hienz RD; Aleszczyk CM; May BJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):1052-8. PubMed ID: 8759958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels.
    Kewley-Port D; Watson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):485-96. PubMed ID: 8120259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Formant-frequency discrimination of synthesized vowels in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and humans.
    Henry KS; Amburgey KN; Abrams KS; Idrobo F; Carney LH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):2073. PubMed ID: 29092534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: effects of formant contour.
    Hillenbrand JM; Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3509-23. PubMed ID: 10380673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustical-perceptual correlates of "whisper pitch" in synthetically generated vowels.
    Higashikawa M; Minifie FD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Jun; 42(3):583-91. PubMed ID: 10391624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spectral change and duration as cues in Australian English listeners' front vowel categorization.
    Williams D; Escudero P; Gafos A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Sep; 144(3):EL215. PubMed ID: 30424675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Formant discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds for English and Chinese listeners.
    Liu C; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):EL189-95. PubMed ID: 22979831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vowel space characteristics and vowel identification accuracy.
    Neel AT
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Jun; 51(3):574-85. PubMed ID: 18506036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic analysis of vowel formant frequencies in genetically-related and non-genetically related speakers with implications for forensic speaker comparison.
    Cavalcanti JC; Eriksson A; Barbosa PA
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246645. PubMed ID: 33600430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The perception of back vowels: centre of gravity hypothesis.
    Assmann PF
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):423-48. PubMed ID: 1775650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of roving level and spectral range on vowel formant discrimination.
    Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL264-70. PubMed ID: 21974502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.
    Culling JF; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3454-67. PubMed ID: 8326071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.