These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 16334959)

  • 1. Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs.
    Fick JL; Novo RE; Kirchhof N
    Am J Vet Res; 2005 Nov; 66(11):1975-84. PubMed ID: 16334959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed with glycomer 631 and lactomer 9-1 using a subcuticular technique in pigs.
    Plavec T; Švara T; Zdovc I; Gombač M; Damjanovska M; Stopar Pintarič T; Cvetko E; Seliškar A
    BMC Vet Res; 2020 Feb; 16(1):87. PubMed ID: 32160877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of absorbable subcuticular staples, continuous subcuticular absorbable suture, and percutaneous metal skin staples on infection in contaminated wounds.
    Pineros-Fernandez A; Salopek LS; Rodeheaver PF; Rodeheaver G
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2012; 22(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 23428250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods.
    Piñeros-Fernandez A; Salopek LS; Rodeheaver PF; Drake DB; Edlich RF; Rodeheaver GT
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 16566742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of incision closures with subcuticular and percutaneous staples.
    Dresner HS; Hilger PA
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2009; 11(5):320-6. PubMed ID: 19797094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
    Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective randomised comparison of 2 skin closure techniques in primary total hip arthroplasty surgery.
    Rui M; Zheng X; Sun SS; Li CY; Zhang XC; Guo KJ; Zhao FC; Pang Y
    Hip Int; 2018 Jan; 28(1):101-105. PubMed ID: 29148019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
    Frishman GN; Schwartz T; Hogan JW
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of absorbable staples for skin closure after tibial plateau leveling osteotomy.
    Watson FC; McMullan W; Jordan CJ; Egan P; Tuan J; Solano MA; Fizpatrick N
    Vet Surg; 2019 Jan; 48(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 30378125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Buried absorbable polyglactin 910 sutures do not result in stronger wounds in porcine full thickness skin incisions.
    Townsend KL; Lear W; Robertson BL; Kruzic JJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():386-389. PubMed ID: 27454524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
    Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of leg wound skin closure in coronary artery bypass graft operations.
    Angelini GD; Butchart EG; Armistead SH; Breckenridge IM
    Thorax; 1984 Dec; 39(12):942-5. PubMed ID: 6096982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of adhesive surgical tape with the absorbable continuous subcuticular suture.
    Kolt JD
    ANZ J Surg; 2003 Aug; 73(8):626-9. PubMed ID: 12887534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of two suture materials for intradermal skin closure in dogs.
    Kirpensteijn J; Maarschalkerweerd RJ; Koeman JP; Kooistra HS; van Sluijs FJ
    Vet Q; 1997 Mar; 19(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 9225425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subcuticular sutures and the rate of inflammation in noncontaminated wounds.
    Austin PE; Dunn KA; Eily-Cofield K; Brown CK; Wooden WA; Bradfield JF
    Ann Emerg Med; 1995 Mar; 25(3):328-30. PubMed ID: 7864471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use.
    Nitsche J; Howell C; Howell T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):979-83. PubMed ID: 22037686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Placement of Absorbable Dermal Staples in Mammaplasty and Abdominoplasty: A 12-Month Prospective Study of 60 Patients.
    Bron T; Zakine G
    Aesthet Surg J; 2016 Apr; 36(4):459-68. PubMed ID: 26530478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.