These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Wear resistance of four luting agents as a function of marginal gap distance, cement type, and restorative material. Guzman AF; Moore BK; Andres CJ Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9495160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations. Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays. Farrell CV; Johnson GH; Oswald MT; Tucker RD J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 18395539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro wear gap formation of self-adhesive resin cements: a CLSM evaluation. Belli R; Pelka M; Petschelt A; Lohbauer U J Dent; 2009 Dec; 37(12):984-93. PubMed ID: 19699255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years: wear of luting composites. Krämer N; Frankenberger R Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):466-72. PubMed ID: 11203858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the tooth-restoration interface wear resistance of two cementation techniques: effect of a surface sealant. Prakki A; Ribeiro IW; Cilli R; Mondelli RF Oper Dent; 2005; 30(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 16382597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composites after toothbrush/dentifrice abrasion. Tanoue N; Matsumura H; Atsuta M J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 10898845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro comparison of restoration wear and tensile strength following extended brushing with Sonicare and a manual toothbrush. Donly KJ; Vargas M; Meckes M; Sharma A; Kugel G; Hurley E J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(1 Spec No):30-5. PubMed ID: 9487843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical and physical properties of contemporary dental luting agents. Attar N; Tam LE; McComb D J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 12616231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations. Ayad MF J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of adhesive luting systems on bond strength and failure mode of an indirect micro ceramic resin-based composite veneer. Sarabi N; Ghavamnasiri M; Forooghbakhsh A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan; 10(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19142254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro wear evaluation of dental materials in primary teeth. da Cunha MR; Puppin-Rontani RM; Ferracane JL; Correr-Sobrinho L Am J Dent; 2006 Dec; 19(6):364-9. PubMed ID: 17212079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Localized wear of compomer restorative materials. Latta MA; Barkmeier WW; Wilwerding TM; Blake SM Am J Dent; 2001 Aug; 14(4):238-40. PubMed ID: 11699744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of 7 luting protocols and their effect on the retention and marginal leakage of a cement-retained dental implant restoration. Pan YH; Ramp LC; Lin CK; Liu PR Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):587-92. PubMed ID: 16955610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives. Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]